From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, CIFS <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Keys: Set 4 - Key ACLs for 5.3
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 18:59:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiFti6=K2fyAYhx-PSX9ovQPJUNp0FMdV0pDaO_pSx9MQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190710201552.GB83443@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 1:15 PM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Also worth noting that the key ACL patches were only in linux-next for 9 days
> before the pull request was sent.
Yes. I was not entirely happy with the whole key subsystem situation.
See my concerns in
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wjEowdfG7v_4ttu3xhf9gqopj1+q1nGG86+mGfGDTEBBg@mail.gmail.com/
for more. That was before I realized it was buggy.
So it really would be good to have more people involved, and more
structure to the keys development (and, I suspect, much else under
security/)
Anyway, since it does seem like David is offline, I've just reverted
this from my tree, and will be continuing my normal merge window pull
requests (the other issues I have seen have fixes in their respective
trees).
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-11 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-05 21:30 [GIT PULL] Keys: Set 4 - Key ACLs for 5.3 David Howells
2019-07-09 3:15 ` pr-tracker-bot
2019-07-10 18:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-07-10 19:46 ` Eric Biggers
2019-07-10 20:15 ` Eric Biggers
2019-07-11 1:59 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2019-07-11 3:07 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-08-16 13:36 ` David Howells
2019-08-21 14:20 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-08-21 15:43 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-08-21 19:22 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wiFti6=K2fyAYhx-PSX9ovQPJUNp0FMdV0pDaO_pSx9MQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).