Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] clk: clock-wizard: Make the output names unique

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@gmail.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, "Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Mike Turquette" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"Shubhrajyoti Datta" <shubhrajyoti.datta@xilinx.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	"Sören Brinkmann" <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] clk: clock-wizard: Make the output names unique
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 22:02:06 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191129190205.GA3282@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfKVtHpP4j32CNA8ioET=wqYPWtzrQvH-A+4n-pcvj1KZy=fg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 05:37:57PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 1:15 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 12:06:15PM +0530, shubhrajyoti.datta@gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@xilinx.com>
> > >
> > > Incase there are more than one instance of the clocking wizard.
> > > And if the output name given is the same then the probe fails.
> > > Fix the same by appending the device name to the output name to
> > > make it unique.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@xilinx.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/clk/clk-xlnx-clock-wizard.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-xlnx-clock-wizard.c b/drivers/clk/clk-xlnx-clock-wizard.c
> > > index 75ea745..9993543 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clk/clk-xlnx-clock-wizard.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-xlnx-clock-wizard.c
> > > @@ -555,6 +555,9 @@ static int clk_wzrd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >               ret = -ENOMEM;
> > >               goto err_disable_clk;
> > >       }
> > > +     outputs = of_property_count_strings(np, "clock-output-names");
> > > +     if (outputs == 1)
> > > +             flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT;
> > >       clk_wzrd->clks_internal[wzrd_clk_mul] = clk_register_fixed_factor
> > >                       (&pdev->dev, clk_name,
> > >                        __clk_get_name(clk_wzrd->clk_in1),
> > > @@ -566,9 +569,6 @@ static int clk_wzrd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >               goto err_disable_clk;
> > >       }
> > >
> > > -     outputs = of_property_count_strings(np, "clock-output-names");
> > > -     if (outputs == 1)
> > > -             flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT;
> > >       clk_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s_mul_div", dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> > >       if (!clk_name) {
> > >               ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > @@ -591,6 +591,7 @@ static int clk_wzrd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >       /* register div per output */
> > >       for (i = outputs - 1; i >= 0 ; i--) {
> > >               const char *clkout_name;
> > > +             const char *clkout_name_wiz;
> > >
> > >               if (of_property_read_string_index(np, "clock-output-names", i,
> > >                                                 &clkout_name)) {
> > > @@ -599,9 +600,11 @@ static int clk_wzrd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >                       ret = -EINVAL;
> > >                       goto err_rm_int_clks;
> > >               }
> > > +             clkout_name_wiz = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s_%s",
> > > +                                         dev_name(&pdev->dev), clkout_name);
> >
> > If this kasprintf() crashes then clk_wzrd_register_divf() will fail.

I meant if kasprintf() returns NULL not crashes...  :/

> > But that was a headache to review.  Just add a check for NULL.  We need
> > a kfree() as well.

regards,
dan carpenter