From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] clk: ux500: Add driver for the reset portions of PRCC
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:50:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <76000fc17c85741ad613edee608143c68be3152a.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210720231837.1576130-2-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Hi Linus,
On Wed, 2021-07-21 at 01:18 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The Ux500 PRCC (peripheral reset and clock controller) can also
> control reset of the IP blocks, not just clocks. As the PRCC is probed
> as a clock controller and we have other platforms implementing combined
> clock and reset controllers, follow this pattern and implement the PRCC
> rest controller as part of the clock driver.
>
> The reset controller needs to be selected from the machine as Ux500 has
> traditionally selected its mandatory subsystem prerequisites from there.
>
> Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> ---
> ChangeLog v1->v2:
> - Rebase on v5.14-rc1
> - Cc Philipp Zabel
Thanks, some comments below.
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-ux500/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/clk/ux500/Makefile | 3 +
> drivers/clk/ux500/prcc.h | 36 +++++++
> drivers/clk/ux500/reset-prcc.c | 159 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/ux500/reset-prcc.h | 22 +++++
> drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_of_clk.c | 32 ++++---
> 6 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/ux500/prcc.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/ux500/reset-prcc.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/ux500/reset-prcc.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/Kconfig
> index c1086ebe0050..24ed7f4a87a4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/Kconfig
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ menuconfig ARCH_U8500
> select REGULATOR_DB8500_PRCMU
> select REGULATOR_FIXED_VOLTAGE
> select SOC_BUS
> + select RESET_CONTROLLER
> help
> Support for ST-Ericsson's Ux500 architecture
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ux500/Makefile b/drivers/clk/ux500/Makefile
> index 53fd29002401..c29b83df403e 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/ux500/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ux500/Makefile
> @@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ obj-y += clk-prcc.o
> obj-y += clk-prcmu.o
> obj-y += clk-sysctrl.o
>
> +# Reset control
> +obj-y += reset-prcc.o
> +
> # Clock definitions
> obj-y += u8500_of_clk.o
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ux500/prcc.h b/drivers/clk/ux500/prcc.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..bf978cace563
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ux500/prcc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +
> +#ifndef __PRCC_H
> +#define __PRCC_H
> +
> +#define PRCC_NUM_PERIPH_CLUSTERS 6
> +#define PRCC_PERIPHS_PER_CLUSTER 32
> +
> +/* CLKRST4 is missing making it hard to index things */
> +enum clkrst_index {
> + CLKRST1_INDEX = 0,
> + CLKRST2_INDEX,
> + CLKRST3_INDEX,
> + CLKRST5_INDEX,
> + CLKRST6_INDEX,
> + CLKRST_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +static inline int prcc_num_to_index(unsigned int num)
> +{
> + switch (num) {
> + case 1:
> + return CLKRST1_INDEX;
> + case 2:
> + return CLKRST2_INDEX;
> + case 3:
> + return CLKRST3_INDEX;
> + case 5:
> + return CLKRST5_INDEX;
> + case 6:
> + return CLKRST6_INDEX;
> + }
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ux500/reset-prcc.c b/drivers/clk/ux500/reset-prcc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..91f9f1942fd9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ux500/reset-prcc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
Is this missing a copyright header?
> +
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/reset-controller.h>
> +#include <linux/bits.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +
> +#include "prcc.h"
> +#include "reset-prcc.h"
> +
> +#define to_u8500_prcc_reset(p) container_of((p), struct u8500_prcc_reset, rcdev)
> +
> +/* This macro flattens the 2-dimensional PRCC numberspace */
> +#define PRCC_RESET_LINE(prcc_num, bit) \
> + ((prcc_num * PRCC_PERIPHS_PER_CLUSTER) + bit)
^^^^^^^^ ^^^
Seems not to be an issue in this case, but it would be good style to
wrap the macro parameters in parentheses anyway.
> +
> +/*
> + * Reset registers in each PRCC - the reset lines are active low
> + * so what you need to do is write a bit for the peripheral you
> + * want to put into reset into the CLEAR register, this will assert
> + * the reset by pulling the line low. SET take the device out of
> + * reset. The status reflects the actual state of the line.
> + */
> +#define PRCC_K_SOFTRST_SET 0x018
> +#define PRCC_K_SOFTRST_CLEAR 0x01c
> +#define PRCC_K_RST_STATUS 0x020
> +
> +static void __iomem *u8500_prcc_reset_base(struct u8500_prcc_reset *ur,
> + unsigned long id)
> +{.
> + unsigned int prcc_num, index;
> +
> + prcc_num = id / PRCC_PERIPHS_PER_CLUSTER;
> + index = prcc_num_to_index(prcc_num);
This is the only user of prcc_num_to_index(). Why is that defined in a
header file separate from this code? Personally, I'd find it easier to
just merge the switch statement in here.
> +
> + if (index > ARRAY_SIZE(ur->base))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return ur->base[index];
> +}
> +
> +static int u8500_prcc_reset(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> + unsigned long id)
> +{
> + struct u8500_prcc_reset *ur = to_u8500_prcc_reset(rcdev);
> + void __iomem *base = u8500_prcc_reset_base(ur, id);
> + unsigned int bit = id % PRCC_PERIPHS_PER_CLUSTER;
> +
> + pr_debug("PRCC cycle reset id %lu, bit %d\n", id, bit);
^^
%u, bit is unsigned int. Same for the other pr_debug() instances below.
> +
> + /* Assert reset and then release it */
> + writel(BIT(bit), base + PRCC_K_SOFTRST_CLEAR);
> + udelay(1);
> + writel(BIT(bit), base + PRCC_K_SOFTRST_SET);
> + udelay(1);
Are these delays known to work for all peripherals?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int u8500_prcc_reset_assert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> + unsigned long id)
> +{
> + struct u8500_prcc_reset *ur = to_u8500_prcc_reset(rcdev);
> + void __iomem *base = u8500_prcc_reset_base(ur, id);
> + unsigned int bit = id % PRCC_PERIPHS_PER_CLUSTER;
> +
> + pr_debug("PRCC assert reset id %lu, bit %d\n", id, bit);
> + writel(BIT(bit), base + PRCC_K_SOFTRST_CLEAR);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int u8500_prcc_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> + unsigned long id)
> +{
> + struct u8500_prcc_reset *ur = to_u8500_prcc_reset(rcdev);
> + void __iomem *base = u8500_prcc_reset_base(ur, id);
> + unsigned int bit = id % PRCC_PERIPHS_PER_CLUSTER;
> +
> + pr_debug("PRCC deassert reset id %lu, bit %d\n", id, bit);
> + writel(BIT(bit), base + PRCC_K_SOFTRST_SET);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int u8500_prcc_reset_status(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> + unsigned long id)
> +{
> + struct u8500_prcc_reset *ur = to_u8500_prcc_reset(rcdev);
> + void __iomem *base = u8500_prcc_reset_base(ur, id);
> + unsigned int bit = id % PRCC_PERIPHS_PER_CLUSTER;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + pr_debug("PRCC check status on reset line id %lu, bit %d\n", id, bit);
> + val = readl(base + PRCC_K_RST_STATUS);
> +
> + /* Active low so return the inverse value of the bit */
> + return !(val & BIT(bit));
> +}
> +
> +static const struct reset_control_ops u8500_prcc_reset_ops = {
> + .reset = u8500_prcc_reset,
> + .assert = u8500_prcc_reset_assert,
> + .deassert = u8500_prcc_reset_deassert,
> + .status = u8500_prcc_reset_status,
> +};
> +
> +static int u8500_prcc_reset_xlate(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> + const struct of_phandle_args *reset_spec)
> +{
> + unsigned int prcc_num, bit;
> +
> + if (reset_spec->args_count != 2)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + prcc_num = reset_spec->args[0];
> + bit = reset_spec->args[1];
> +
> + if (prcc_num != 1 && prcc_num != 2 && prcc_num != 3 &&
> + prcc_num != 5 && prcc_num != 6) {
> + pr_err("%s: invalid PRCC %d\n", __func__, prcc_num);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
This function should also return -EINVAL if (bit >= 32).
> + pr_debug("located reset line %d at PRCC %d bit %d\n",
> + PRCC_RESET_LINE(prcc_num, bit), prcc_num, bit);
> +
> + return PRCC_RESET_LINE(prcc_num, bit);
> +}
> +
> +void u8500_prcc_reset_init(struct device_node *np, struct u8500_prcc_reset *ur)
> +{
> + struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev = &ur->rcdev;
> + int ret;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < CLKRST_MAX; i++) {
> + ur->base[i] = ioremap(ur->phy_base[i], SZ_4K);
> + if (!ur->base[i])
> + pr_err("PRCC failed to remap for reset base %d (%08x)\n",
> + i, ur->phy_base[i]);
> + }
> +
> + rcdev->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + rcdev->nr_resets = 256; /* Only used with simple xlate */
This is unused, I'd just leave it out.
> + rcdev->ops = &u8500_prcc_reset_ops;
> + rcdev->of_node = np;
> + rcdev->of_reset_n_cells = 2;
> + rcdev->of_xlate = u8500_prcc_reset_xlate;
> +
> + ret = reset_controller_register(rcdev);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_err("PRCC failed to register reset controller\n");
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ux500/reset-prcc.h b/drivers/clk/ux500/reset-prcc.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8bdc6df23d14
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ux500/reset-prcc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +
> +#ifndef __RESET_PRCC_H
> +#define __RESET_PRCC_H
> +
> +#include <linux/reset-controller.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +
> +/**
> + * struct u8500_prcc_reset - U8500 PRCC reset controller state
> + * @rcdev: reset controller device
> + * @bases: the PRCC bases
^^^^^^
Should be @base now, @phy_base is missing.
> + */
> +struct u8500_prcc_reset {
> + struct reset_controller_dev rcdev;
> + u32 phy_base[CLKRST_MAX];
> + void __iomem *base[CLKRST_MAX];
> +};
> +
> +void u8500_prcc_reset_init(struct device_node *np, struct u8500_prcc_reset *ur);
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_of_clk.c b/drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_of_clk.c
> index 0aedd42fad52..330d45ab27a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_of_clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_of_clk.c
> @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/dbx500-prcmu.h>
> -#include "clk.h"
>
> -#define PRCC_NUM_PERIPH_CLUSTERS 6
> -#define PRCC_PERIPHS_PER_CLUSTER 32
> +#include "clk.h"
> +#include "prcc.h"
> +#include "reset-prcc.h"
>
> static struct clk *prcmu_clk[PRCMU_NUM_CLKS];
> static struct clk *prcc_pclk[(PRCC_NUM_PERIPH_CLUSTERS + 1) * PRCC_PERIPHS_PER_CLUSTER];
> @@ -46,16 +46,6 @@ static struct clk *ux500_twocell_get(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec,
> return PRCC_SHOW(clk_data, base, bit);
> }
>
> -/* CLKRST4 is missing making it hard to index things */
> -enum clkrst_index {
> - CLKRST1_INDEX = 0,
> - CLKRST2_INDEX,
> - CLKRST3_INDEX,
> - CLKRST5_INDEX,
> - CLKRST6_INDEX,
> - CLKRST_MAX,
> -};
> -
> static void u8500_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
> {
> struct prcmu_fw_version *fw_version;
> @@ -63,8 +53,20 @@ static void u8500_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
> const char *sgaclk_parent = NULL;
> struct clk *clk, *rtc_clk, *twd_clk;
> u32 bases[CLKRST_MAX];
> + struct u8500_prcc_reset *rstc;
> int i;
>
> + /*
> + * We allocate the reset controller here so that we can fill in the
> + * base addresses properly and pass to the reset controller init
> + * function later on.
> + */
> + rstc = kzalloc(sizeof(*rstc), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rstc) {
> + pr_err("could not allocate reset controller\n");
I think checkpatch will warn about this.
> + return;
> + }
> +
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bases); i++) {
> struct resource r;
>
> @@ -73,6 +75,7 @@ static void u8500_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
> pr_err("failed to get CLKRST %d base address\n",
> i + 1);
> bases[i] = r.start;
> + rstc->phy_base[i] = r.start;
> }
>
> /* Clock sources */
> @@ -562,6 +565,9 @@ static void u8500_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
>
> if (of_node_name_eq(child, "smp-twd-clock"))
> of_clk_add_provider(child, of_clk_src_simple_get, twd_clk);
> +
> + if (of_node_name_eq(child, "prcc-reset-controller"))
> + u8500_prcc_reset_init(child, rstc);
> }
> }
> CLK_OF_DECLARE(u8500_clks, "stericsson,u8500-clks", u8500_clk_init);
regards
Philipp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-21 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-20 23:18 [PATCH 1/2 v2] dt-bindings: clock: u8500: Rewrite in YAML and extend Linus Walleij
2021-07-20 23:18 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] clk: ux500: Add driver for the reset portions of PRCC Linus Walleij
2021-07-21 9:50 ` Philipp Zabel [this message]
2021-07-29 19:54 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] dt-bindings: clock: u8500: Rewrite in YAML and extend Rob Herring
2021-08-02 15:54 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=76000fc17c85741ad613edee608143c68be3152a.camel@pengutronix.de \
--to=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).