From: Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com>
To: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
Cc: Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] soc: mediatek: add mtk-devapc driver
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:52:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1596163970.3932.24.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAOTY_9HXv+OsSRF7P9=cRy9AYZ0vwffgo3Kc8V=qQ6ce90uJw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Chun-Kuang,
On Fri, 2020-07-31 at 00:14 +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> Hi, Neal:
>
> Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com> 於 2020年7月29日 週三 下午4:29寫道:
> >
> > MediaTek bus fabric provides TrustZone security support and data
> > protection to prevent slaves from being accessed by unexpected
> > masters.
> > The security violation is logged and sent to the processor for
> > further analysis or countermeasures.
> >
> > Any occurrence of security violation would raise an interrupt, and
> > it will be handled by mtk-devapc driver. The violation
> > information is printed in order to find the murderer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com>
> > ---
>
> [snip]
>
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * devapc_extract_vio_dbg - extract full violation information after doing
> > + * shift mechanism.
> > + */
> > +static void devapc_extract_vio_dbg(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
> > +{
> > + const struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs *vio_dbgs;
> > + struct mtk_devapc_vio_info *vio_info;
> > + void __iomem *vio_dbg0_reg;
> > + void __iomem *vio_dbg1_reg;
> > + u32 dbg0;
> > +
> > + vio_dbg0_reg = ctx->devapc_pd_base + ctx->offset->vio_dbg0;
> > + vio_dbg1_reg = ctx->devapc_pd_base + ctx->offset->vio_dbg1;
> > +
> > + vio_dbgs = ctx->vio_dbgs;
> > + vio_info = ctx->vio_info;
> > +
> > + /* Starts to extract violation information */
> > + dbg0 = readl(vio_dbg0_reg);
> > + vio_info->vio_addr = readl(vio_dbg1_reg);
> > +
> > + vio_info->master_id = (dbg0 & vio_dbgs->mstid.mask) >>
> > + vio_dbgs->mstid.start;
> > + vio_info->domain_id = (dbg0 & vio_dbgs->dmnid.mask) >>
> > + vio_dbgs->dmnid.start;
> > + vio_info->write = ((dbg0 & vio_dbgs->vio_w.mask) >>
> > + vio_dbgs->vio_w.start) == 1;
> > + vio_info->read = ((dbg0 & vio_dbgs->vio_r.mask) >>
> > + vio_dbgs->vio_r.start) == 1;
> > + vio_info->vio_addr_high = (dbg0 & vio_dbgs->addr_h.mask) >>
> > + vio_dbgs->addr_h.start;
>
>
> I would like to define the type of ctx->vio_info to be
>
> struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs {
> u32 mstid:16;
> u32 dmnid:6;
> u32 vio_w:1;
> u32 vio_r:1;
> u32 addr_h:4;
> u32 resv:4;
> };
>
> so the code would like the simple way
>
> ctx->vio_info = (struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs)readl(vio_dbg1_reg);
>
This idea looks great! Is there any possible to pass the bit layout by
DT data, and still make this operation simple?
Why am I asking this question is because this bit layout is platform
dependent.
> Regards,
> Chun-Kuang.
>
> > +
> > + devapc_vio_info_print(ctx);
> > +}
> > +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-31 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-29 8:18 [PATCH v4] Add MediaTek MT6779 devapc driver Neal Liu
2020-07-29 8:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: devapc: add bindings for mtk-devapc Neal Liu
2020-07-29 8:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] soc: mediatek: add mtk-devapc driver Neal Liu
2020-07-29 16:38 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-07-31 2:44 ` Neal Liu
2020-07-31 15:03 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-08-03 3:32 ` Neal Liu
2020-08-03 16:13 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-08-04 2:18 ` Neal Liu
2020-08-04 15:27 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-07-29 22:47 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-07-31 2:47 ` Neal Liu
2020-07-30 16:14 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-07-31 2:52 ` Neal Liu [this message]
2020-07-31 15:55 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-08-03 3:41 ` Neal Liu
2020-08-01 0:12 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-08-03 4:01 ` Neal Liu
2020-08-03 16:04 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-08-04 2:08 ` Neal Liu
2020-08-04 15:55 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-08-01 23:50 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-08-03 4:05 ` Neal Liu
2020-08-03 15:38 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1596163970.3932.24.camel@mtkswgap22 \
--to=neal.liu@mediatek.com \
--cc=chunkuang.hu@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).