On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 04:17:31PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 2:57 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:

> > DPCM is an implementation detail of Linux (and one that we want to phase
> > out going forwards too), we shouldn't be putting it in the DT bindings
> > where it becomes an ABI.

> I see your point. This is way I marked the patch series as RFC. I need to find
> another way to reuse simple-card as machine driver for SOF.

Have a look at the way the Renesas systems are using this and the audio
graph card - they have DPCM.