Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] dt-bindings: display: Add idk-2121wr binding

[Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>]

Hi Fabrizio,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 07:36:36PM +0100, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
> Add binding for the idk-2121wr LVDS panel from Advantech.
> 
> Some panel-specific documentation can be found here:
> https://buy.advantech.eu/Displays/Embedded-LCD-Kits-High-Brightness/model-IDK-2121WR-K2FHA2E.htm
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com>
> 
> ---
> v2->v3:
> * new patch
> ---
>  .../display/panel/advantech,idk-2121wr.yaml        | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/advantech,idk-2121wr.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/advantech,idk-2121wr.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/advantech,idk-2121wr.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b2ccdc8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/advantech,idk-2121wr.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/panel/advantech,idk-2121wr.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Advantech IDK-2121WR 21.5" Full-HD dual-LVDS panel
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com>
> +  - Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> +
> +description: |
> +  The IDK-2121WR from Advantech is a Full-HD dual-LVDS panel.
> +
> +  The panels expects odd pixels from the first port, and even pixels from

s/panels/panel/
Maybe s/from the/on the/g ?

> +  the second port, therefore the ports must be marked accordingly.
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: lvds.yaml#
> +  - $ref: ../bus-timings/lvds.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    items:
> +      - const: advantech,idk-2121wr
> +      - {} # panel-lvds, but not listed here to avoid false select
> +
> +  data-mapping:
> +    const: vesa-24
> +
> +  width-mm:
> +    const: 476
> +
> +  height-mm:
> +    const: 268
> +
> +  panel-timing: true
> +  ports: true
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible

Shouldn't data-mapping, width-mm, height-mm and ports be required too ?

As you mentioned in the cover letter, validating ports, port and the new
dual-lvds-*-pixels properties would be nice. I'm not YAML schema
specialist, so I'm fine with a best effort approach here, but as far as
I understand Rob proposed a way forward, could you try it ?

Apart from that, the bindings look sne to me, so

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

once the above issues get addressed.

> +
> +examples:
> +  - |+
> +    panel-lvds {
> +      compatible = "advantech,idk-2121wr", "panel-lvds";
> +
> +      width-mm = <476>;
> +      height-mm = <268>;
> +
> +      data-mapping = "vesa-24";
> +
> +      panel-timing {
> +        clock-frequency = <148500000>;
> +        hactive = <1920>;
> +        vactive = <1080>;
> +        hsync-len = <44>;
> +        hfront-porch = <88>;
> +        hback-porch = <148>;
> +        vfront-porch = <4>;
> +        vback-porch = <36>;
> +        vsync-len = <5>;
> +      };
> +
> +      ports {
> +        #address-cells = <1>;
> +        #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +        port@0 {
> +          reg = <0>;
> +          dual-lvds-odd-pixels;
> +          panel_in0: endpoint {
> +            remote-endpoint = <&lvds0_out>;
> +          };
> +        };
> +
> +        port@1 {
> +          reg = <1>;
> +          dual-lvds-even-pixels;
> +          panel_in1: endpoint {
> +            remote-endpoint = <&lvds1_out>;
> +          };
> +        };
> +      };
> +    };
> +
> +...

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart