From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Prisk Subject: RE: [PATCHv4 0/9] *** ARM: Update arch-vt8500 to Devicetree *** Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:58:29 +0000 Message-ID: <76F764B079F92A4E843589C893D0A022DAF68C14@SERVER.prisktech.co.nz> References: <1345707346-9035-1-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz>, <201208231040.16702.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201208231040.16702.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org> Content-Language: en-GB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Alessandro Zummo , "linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Russell King , Linus Walleij , "rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org" , Florian Tobias Schandinat , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org" , "linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Rob Herring , "linux-serial-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "vt8500-wm8505-linux-kernel-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org" , Stephen Warren , Mike Turquette , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org >On Thursday 23 August 2012, Tony Prisk wrote: >> Patchset based on Arnd's arm-soc/for-next branch. >> >> >> Could I get this reviewed, hopefully for inclusion into v3.7. >I can take them into the arm-soc tree if there are no new comments. >For the last two patches, you need to get an Acked-by comment from the >gpio and clk maintainers, respectively, or you should send them >the patches for inclusion in those subsystem trees. > Arnd Linus W has provided some feedback on the gpio driver - I missed the issues he raised the first time around so just waiting for him to take a look at v4 when he's got time. I haven't heard from Mike T in regards to the new clock code - He did reply about the original patch (pre-devicetree) but I asked him to hold off reviewing it because it was going to be rewritten. EHCI/UHCI has gone to -next (on patchv2) via usb-next git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git There haven't been any changes to it in v3/v4. GPIO going via another tree isn't really an issue if necessary. Without the clock patch (9/9), the mach-vt8500 patch (6/9) won't compile due to unresolved symbols. In arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c - you will get an unresolved symbol for 'vtwm_clk_init' Not sure if this matters, thought I should point it out. Does it need to compile cleanly in your tree (which is what I would assume), or just once its all combined in -next? Does it matter that the usb patches are already in -next? I don't really understand the requirements around submitting to individual trees and which (if any) of these points are actually issues. Regards Tony Prisk