Re: [PATCH 15/26] docs: i2c: smbus-protocol: enable kernel-doc function syntax

[Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>]

Hi Jean,

On 20/01/20 15:44, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Sun,  5 Jan 2020 23:50:01 +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>> Hyperlinks from function names are not generated in headings. Move them in
>> the plain text so they are rendered as clickable hyerlinks.
> 
> typo: hyperlinks

Ok.

>>
>> While there also remove an unneeded colon in a heading.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst | 64 ++++++++++++++++++----------
>>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst b/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst
>> index 10c4a989982c..997945e90419 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst
>> @@ -62,8 +62,10 @@ This sends a single bit to the device, at the place of the Rd/Wr bit::
>>  Functionality flag: I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_QUICK
>>  
>>  
>> -SMBus Receive Byte:  i2c_smbus_read_byte()
>> -==========================================
>> +SMBus Receive Byte
>> +==================
>> +
>> +Implemented by i2c_smbus_read_byte()
> 
> In file i2c-protocol.rst, the wording used is:
> 
> This corresponds to i2c_transfer().
> 
> For consistency, can we settle for "Implemented by foo()" everywhere?

Good point. For v2 I added a new patch to use "Implemented by" also in
i2c-protocol.rst.

Thanks.

By extrapolation I guess you want to review the few remaining patches.
Correnct? In this case I'd wait for that before sending out v2.

-- 
Luca