From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54898C3A5A8 for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 08:01:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33151233A2 for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 08:01:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728625AbfIAIBC (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Sep 2019 04:01:02 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:40643 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727083AbfIAIBC (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Sep 2019 04:01:02 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id B3211227A8B; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 10:00:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 10:00:55 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Paul Walmsley Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Christoph Hellwig , Borislav Petkov , palmer@sifive.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yash Shah Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: move sifive_l2_cache.c to drivers/soc Message-ID: <20190901080055.GA12035@lst.de> References: <20190818082935.14869-1-hch@lst.de> <20190819060904.GA4841@zn.tnic> <20190819062619.GA20211@lst.de> <20190822062635.00f6e507@coco.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-edac-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:53:17PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > There's already a MAINTAINERS entry that should cover drivers/soc/sifive. > Probably it's not needed to add another one here. So are you going to apply the original patch to the riscv tree? I dont want to keep this file lingering around as a force built part of the riscv build for another merge window.