From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
"linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/19] EDAC, mc: Reorder functions edac_mc_alloc*()
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 07:45:38 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011074538.7ad8715c@coco.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191010202418.25098-10-rrichter@marvell.com>
Em Thu, 10 Oct 2019 20:25:22 +0000
Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com> escreveu:
> Reorder the new created functions edac_mc_alloc_csrows() and
> edac_mc_alloc_dimms() and move them before edac_mc_alloc(). No further
> code changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
> index 0db504cb3419..6d880cf4d599 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
> @@ -305,93 +305,6 @@ static void _edac_mc_free(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
> kfree(mci);
> }
>
> -static int edac_mc_alloc_csrows(struct mem_ctl_info *mci);
> -static int edac_mc_alloc_dimms(struct mem_ctl_info *mci);
> -
> -struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned int mc_num,
> - unsigned int n_layers,
> - struct edac_mc_layer *layers,
> - unsigned int sz_pvt)
> -{
> - struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
> - struct edac_mc_layer *layer;
> - unsigned int idx, size, tot_dimms = 1;
> - unsigned int tot_csrows = 1, tot_channels = 1;
> - void *pvt, *ptr = NULL;
> - bool per_rank = false;
> -
> - if (WARN_ON(n_layers > EDAC_MAX_LAYERS || n_layers == 0))
> - return NULL;
> -
> - /*
> - * Calculate the total amount of dimms and csrows/cschannels while
> - * in the old API emulation mode
> - */
> - for (idx = 0; idx < n_layers; idx++) {
> - tot_dimms *= layers[idx].size;
> - if (layers[idx].is_virt_csrow)
> - tot_csrows *= layers[idx].size;
> - else
> - tot_channels *= layers[idx].size;
> -
> - if (layers[idx].type == EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHIP_SELECT)
> - per_rank = true;
> - }
> -
> - /* Figure out the offsets of the various items from the start of an mc
> - * structure. We want the alignment of each item to be at least as
> - * stringent as what the compiler would provide if we could simply
> - * hardcode everything into a single struct.
> - */
> - mci = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*mci), 1);
> - layer = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*layer), n_layers);
> - pvt = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sz_pvt, 1);
> - size = ((unsigned long)pvt) + sz_pvt;
> -
> - edac_dbg(1, "allocating %u bytes for mci data (%d %s, %d csrows/channels)\n",
> - size,
> - tot_dimms,
> - per_rank ? "ranks" : "dimms",
> - tot_csrows * tot_channels);
> -
> - mci = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (mci == NULL)
> - return NULL;
> -
> - /* Adjust pointers so they point within the memory we just allocated
> - * rather than an imaginary chunk of memory located at address 0.
> - */
> - layer = (struct edac_mc_layer *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)layer));
> - pvt = sz_pvt ? (((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)pvt)) : NULL;
> -
> - /* setup index and various internal pointers */
> - mci->mc_idx = mc_num;
> - mci->tot_dimms = tot_dimms;
> - mci->pvt_info = pvt;
> - mci->n_layers = n_layers;
> - mci->layers = layer;
> - memcpy(mci->layers, layers, sizeof(*layer) * n_layers);
> - mci->nr_csrows = tot_csrows;
> - mci->num_cschannel = tot_channels;
> - mci->csbased = per_rank;
> -
> - if (edac_mc_alloc_csrows(mci))
> - goto error;
> -
> - if (edac_mc_alloc_dimms(mci))
> - goto error;
> -
> - mci->op_state = OP_ALLOC;
> -
> - return mci;
> -
> -error:
> - _edac_mc_free(mci);
> -
> - return NULL;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_alloc);
> -
> static int edac_mc_alloc_csrows(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
> {
> unsigned int tot_csrows = mci->nr_csrows;
> @@ -520,6 +433,90 @@ static int edac_mc_alloc_dimms(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned int mc_num,
> + unsigned int n_layers,
> + struct edac_mc_layer *layers,
> + unsigned int sz_pvt)
> +{
> + struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
> + struct edac_mc_layer *layer;
> + unsigned int idx, size, tot_dimms = 1;
> + unsigned int tot_csrows = 1, tot_channels = 1;
> + void *pvt, *ptr = NULL;
> + bool per_rank = false;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(n_layers > EDAC_MAX_LAYERS || n_layers == 0))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /*
> + * Calculate the total amount of dimms and csrows/cschannels while
> + * in the old API emulation mode
> + */
> + for (idx = 0; idx < n_layers; idx++) {
> + tot_dimms *= layers[idx].size;
> + if (layers[idx].is_virt_csrow)
> + tot_csrows *= layers[idx].size;
> + else
> + tot_channels *= layers[idx].size;
> +
> + if (layers[idx].type == EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHIP_SELECT)
> + per_rank = true;
> + }
> +
> + /* Figure out the offsets of the various items from the start of an mc
> + * structure. We want the alignment of each item to be at least as
> + * stringent as what the compiler would provide if we could simply
> + * hardcode everything into a single struct.
> + */
> + mci = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*mci), 1);
> + layer = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*layer), n_layers);
> + pvt = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sz_pvt, 1);
> + size = ((unsigned long)pvt) + sz_pvt;
> +
> + edac_dbg(1, "allocating %u bytes for mci data (%d %s, %d csrows/channels)\n",
> + size,
> + tot_dimms,
> + per_rank ? "ranks" : "dimms",
> + tot_csrows * tot_channels);
> +
> + mci = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (mci == NULL)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /* Adjust pointers so they point within the memory we just allocated
> + * rather than an imaginary chunk of memory located at address 0.
> + */
> + layer = (struct edac_mc_layer *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)layer));
> + pvt = sz_pvt ? (((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)pvt)) : NULL;
> +
> + /* setup index and various internal pointers */
> + mci->mc_idx = mc_num;
> + mci->tot_dimms = tot_dimms;
> + mci->pvt_info = pvt;
> + mci->n_layers = n_layers;
> + mci->layers = layer;
> + memcpy(mci->layers, layers, sizeof(*layer) * n_layers);
> + mci->nr_csrows = tot_csrows;
> + mci->num_cschannel = tot_channels;
> + mci->csbased = per_rank;
> +
> + if (edac_mc_alloc_csrows(mci))
> + goto error;
> +
> + if (edac_mc_alloc_dimms(mci))
> + goto error;
> +
> + mci->op_state = OP_ALLOC;
> +
> + return mci;
> +
> +error:
> + _edac_mc_free(mci);
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_alloc);
> +
> void edac_mc_free(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
> {
> edac_dbg(1, "\n");
Thanks,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-11 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-10 20:25 [PATCH 00/19] EDAC: Rework edac_mc and ghes drivers Robert Richter
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 01/19] EDAC: Replace EDAC_DIMM_PTR() macro with edac_get_dimm() function Robert Richter
2019-10-11 9:58 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-11 11:38 ` Robert Richter
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 02/19] EDAC: Remove EDAC_DIMM_OFF() macro Robert Richter
2019-10-11 10:09 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-11 11:36 ` Robert Richter
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 03/19] EDAC: Introduce mci_for_each_dimm() iterator Robert Richter
2019-10-11 10:14 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 04/19] EDAC, mc: Do not BUG_ON() in edac_mc_alloc() Robert Richter
2019-10-11 10:15 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 05/19] EDAC, mc: Reduce indentation level in edac_mc_handle_error() Robert Richter
2019-10-10 22:10 ` Joe Perches
2019-10-11 6:50 ` Robert Richter
2019-10-11 10:20 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-11 10:50 ` Joe Perches
2019-10-11 12:08 ` Robert Richter
2019-10-11 14:49 ` Joe Perches
2019-10-11 10:17 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 06/19] EDAC, mc: Remove per layer counters Robert Richter
2019-10-11 10:40 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-14 11:12 ` Robert Richter
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 07/19] EDAC, mc: Rename iterator variable to idx Robert Richter
2019-10-11 10:41 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 08/19] EDAC, mc: Split edac_mc_alloc() into smaller functions Robert Richter
2019-10-11 10:43 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 09/19] EDAC, mc: Reorder functions edac_mc_alloc*() Robert Richter
2019-10-11 10:45 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 10/19] EDAC, mc: Rework edac_raw_mc_handle_error() to use struct dimm_info Robert Richter
2019-10-11 10:48 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 11/19] EDAC: Remove misleading comment in struct edac_raw_error_desc Robert Richter
2019-10-11 10:49 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 12/19] EDAC: Store error type " Robert Richter
2019-10-11 10:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-14 11:47 ` Robert Richter
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 13/19] EDAC, mc: Determine mci pointer from the error descriptor Robert Richter
2019-10-11 10:56 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 14/19] EDAC, mc: Create new function edac_inc_csrow() Robert Richter
2019-10-11 11:08 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-14 11:58 ` Robert Richter
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 15/19] EDAC, ghes: Use standard kernel macros for page calculations Robert Richter
2019-10-11 11:10 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 16/19] EDAC, ghes: Fix grain calculation Robert Richter
2019-10-11 11:22 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 17/19] EDAC, ghes: Remove intermediate buffer pvt->detail_location Robert Richter
2019-10-11 11:20 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 18/19] EDAC, ghes: Unify trace_mc_event() code with edac_mc driver Robert Richter
2019-10-11 11:23 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 19/19] EDAC, Documentation: Describe CPER module definition and DIMM ranks Robert Richter
2019-10-11 11:29 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-10 20:36 ` [PATCH 00/19] EDAC: Rework edac_mc and ghes drivers Robert Richter
2019-10-14 12:00 ` Robert Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191011074538.7ad8715c@coco.lan \
--to=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@marvell.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).