From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F39117350B; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:32:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710441121; cv=none; b=EZoUVEHF++UUYYt9fb4/hpjdkwvysB7w0VUIEI9O2BDkfjP0eTCf6ipD2zul41ZM0Vay59ZbvyxbNemQA6K2KZ/JiceRnVHizaFGaAt7qQxyvwHP8orXEaXHYptopGpdU5Qq6kM/b2cyAyj/DouG1jAfxb0+2g+ND+dPzIeYFjc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710441121; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mvdnoLfy3ROkxmfR7t2H/wROfPIdheF/nBqPtCWPX4A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=caLa/U/pxbHZR3c2cgLYTWNfRiA+6oquCYVT0Zmwd3BR/OrkH/rbhZk1lY5pP3oWRjph2JZwAmOZLHBdGaQYp7AYEQdESRFcyNEAwWBKfS3IFbfttuB+96ugNrUdTjPMYwMOfjTBCQ7G8BRIlMWMFp5hWA2G/VbK2/563kweVw8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A243FC43390; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:34:06 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Alison Schofield Cc: LKML , Linux Trace Kernel , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Linus Torvalds , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org, ath12k@lists.infradead.org, brcm80211@lists.linux.dev, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, Julia Lawall Subject: Re: [FYI][PATCH] tracing/treewide: Remove second parameter of __assign_str() Message-ID: <20240314143406.6289a060@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20240223125634.2888c973@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 09:57:57 -0700 Alison Schofield wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:56:34PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" > > > > [ > > This is a treewide change. I will likely re-create this patch again in > > the second week of the merge window of v6.9 and submit it then. Hoping > > to keep the conflicts that it will cause to a minimum. > > ] Note, change of plans. I plan on sending this in the next merge window, as this merge window I have this patch: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20240312113002.00031668@gandalf.local.home/ That will warn if the source string of __string() is different than the source string of __assign_str(). I want to make sure they are identical before just dropping one of them. > > > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/trace.h b/drivers/cxl/core/trace.h > > index bdf117a33744..07ba4e033347 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/trace.h > > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/trace.h > > snip to poison > > > @@ -668,8 +668,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(cxl_poison, > > ), > > > > TP_fast_assign( > > - __assign_str(memdev, dev_name(&cxlmd->dev)); > > - __assign_str(host, dev_name(cxlmd->dev.parent)); > > + __assign_str(memdev); > > + __assign_str(host); > > I think I get that the above changes work because the TP_STRUCT__entry for > these did: > __string(memdev, dev_name(&cxlmd->dev)) > __string(host, dev_name(cxlmd->dev.parent)) That's the point. They have to be identical or you will likely bug. The __string(name, src) is used to find the string length of src which allocates the necessary length on the ring buffer. The __assign_str(name, src) will copy src into the ring buffer. Similar to: len = strlen(src); buf = malloc(len); strcpy(buf, str); Where __string() is strlen() and __assign_str() is strcpy(). It doesn't make sense to use two different strings, and if you did, it would likely be a bug. But the magic behind __string() does much more than just get the length of the string, and it could easily save the pointer to the string (along with its length) and have it copy that in the __assign_str() call, making the src parameter of __assign_str() useless. > > > __entry->serial = cxlmd->cxlds->serial; > > __entry->overflow_ts = cxl_poison_overflow(flags, overflow_ts); > > __entry->dpa = cxl_poison_record_dpa(record); > > @@ -678,12 +678,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(cxl_poison, > > __entry->trace_type = trace_type; > > __entry->flags = flags; > > if (region) { > > - __assign_str(region, dev_name(®ion->dev)); > > + __assign_str(region); > > memcpy(__entry->uuid, ®ion->params.uuid, 16); > > __entry->hpa = cxl_trace_hpa(region, cxlmd, > > __entry->dpa); > > } else { > > - __assign_str(region, ""); > > + __assign_str(region); > > memset(__entry->uuid, 0, 16); > > __entry->hpa = ULLONG_MAX; > > For the above 2, there was no helper in TP_STRUCT__entry. A recently > posted patch is fixing that up to be __string(region, NULL) See [1], > with the actual assignment still happening in TP_fast_assign. __string(region, NULL) doesn't make sense. It's like: len = strlen(NULL); buf = malloc(len); strcpy(buf, NULL); ?? I'll reply to that email. -- Steve > > Does that assign logic need to move to the TP_STRUCT__entry definition > when you merge these changes? I'm not clear how much logic is able to be > included, ie like 'C' style code in the TP_STRUCT__entry. > > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20240314044301.2108650-1-alison.schofield@intel.com/