From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
To: linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] More EFI changes for v5.10
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:37:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXG8=tO+nSE_m5N=7tz6VOgMwuBj7dPis4jYhA1jw1q-Bw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200929182405.31809-1-ardb@kernel.org>
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 20:24, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> The following changes since commit 612b5d506d066cdf0a739963e7cd28642d500ec1:
>
> cper,edac,efi: Memory Error Record: bank group/address and chip id (2020-09-17 10:19:52 +0300)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi.git tags/efi-next-for-v5.10-2
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 963fabf37f6a94214a823df0a785e653cb8ad6ea:
>
> efi: efivars: limit availability to X86 builds (2020-09-29 19:40:57 +0200)
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
>
It appears there is an issue with this PR in tip efi/core:
My previous pull request for v5.10 ended at 612b5d506d066c (mentioned
above), and the 7 patches below were meant to go on top.
However, that commit (and some of its parents) appear in tip efi/core
under a different commit ID, and therefore, the merge of this PR
resulted in a non-FF merge, and the following patches now appear in
duplicate:
612b5d506d06 (tag: efi-next-for-v5.10) cper,edac,efi: Memory Error
Record: bank group/address and chip id
9baf68cc4544 edac,ghes,cper: Add Row Extension to Memory Error Record
4a568ce29d3f efi/x86: Add a quirk to support command line arguments on
Dell EFI firmware
744de4180a43 cper,edac,efi: Memory Error Record: bank group/address and chip id
3c029b01da60 edac,ghes,cper: Add Row Extension to Memory Error Record
d2778b4891fb efi/x86: Add a quirk to support command line arguments on
Dell EFI firmware
The only difference between d2778b4891fb and 4a568ce29d3f is that I
fixed up a typo in a person's name in the commit log, the patches are
otherwise identical. I recreated the tag right after, and the correct
commit ID is referenced in the PR I sent originally. However, I don't
remember if I failed to push the changes to kernel.org right away, or
whether this is a kernel.org mirroring issue, but the end result is
that that the wrong version of the tag got merged into efi/core
This is not the end of the world, as the patches are identical.
However, if you prefer to fix it, please reset efi/core to
tags/efi-next-for-v5.10-2 - it covers the whole batch of EFI changes
for v5.10.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Second batch of EFI updates for v5.10:
> - followup fix for the new MOKvar table code
> - split efi-pstore from the deprecated efivars sysfs code, so we can
> disable the latter on !x86
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Ard Biesheuvel (7):
> efi: mokvar-table: fix some issues in new code
> efi: pstore: disentangle from deprecated efivars module
> efi: pstore: move workqueue handling out of efivars
> efi: efivars: un-export efivars_sysfs_init()
> efi: gsmi: fix false dependency on CONFIG_EFI_VARS
> efi: remove some false dependencies on CONFIG_EFI_VARS
> efi: efivars: limit availability to X86 builds
>
> Documentation/arm/uefi.rst | 2 +-
> drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig | 18 +++-----
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi-pstore.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/firmware/efi/efivars.c | 45 +-------------------
> drivers/firmware/efi/mokvar-table.c | 25 +++++------
> drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c | 21 ----------
> drivers/firmware/google/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/firmware/google/gsmi.c | 8 ++--
> include/linux/efi.h | 11 -----
> 9 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-30 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-29 18:24 [GIT PULL] More EFI changes for v5.10 Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-30 6:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2020-09-30 7:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-09-30 7:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMj1kXG8=tO+nSE_m5N=7tz6VOgMwuBj7dPis4jYhA1jw1q-Bw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).