linux-efi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@wdc.com>
To: "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ardb@kernel.org" <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: "mingo@kernel.org" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"nivedita@alum.mit.edu" <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>,
	"lukas@wunner.de" <lukas@wunner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/19] efi/libstub: Use hidden visiblity for all source files
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 23:15:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3402c42836aca94d1a2ff385c088af605578068.camel@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200210160248.4889-4-ardb@kernel.org>

On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 17:02 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Instead of setting the visibility pragma for a small set of symbol
> declarations that could result in absolute references that we cannot
> support in the stub, declare hidden visibility for all code in the
> EFI stub, which is more robust and future proof.
> 
> To ensure that the #pragma is taken into account before any other
> includes are processed, put it in a header file of its own and
> include it via the compiler command line using the -include option.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h              | 3 ---
>  drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile     | 2 +-
>  drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm64-stub.c | 8 +-------
>  drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/hidden.h     | 6 ++++++
>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h
> index 44531a69d32b..56ae87401a26 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h
> @@ -107,9 +107,6 @@ static inline void free_screen_info(struct
> screen_info *si)
>  {
>  }
>  
> -/* redeclare as 'hidden' so the compiler will generate relative
> references */
> -extern struct screen_info screen_info
> __attribute__((__visibility__("hidden")));
> -
>  static inline void efifb_setup_from_dmi(struct screen_info *si,
> const char *opt)
>  {
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile
> b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile
> index f14b7636323a..4efdbd711e8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ cflags-$(CONFIG_ARM)		:= $(subst
> $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE),,$(KBUILD_CFLAGS)) \
>  cflags-$(CONFIG_EFI_ARMSTUB)	+= -I$(srctree)/scripts/dtc/libfdt
>  
>  KBUILD_CFLAGS			:= $(cflags-y)
> -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING \
> -				   -D__NO_FORTIFY \
> +				   -include hidden.h -D__NO_FORTIFY \
>  				   $(call cc-option,-ffreestanding) \
>  				   $(call cc-option,-fno-stack-
> protector) \
>  				   -D__DISABLE_EXPORTS
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm64-stub.c
> b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm64-stub.c
> index 2915b44132e6..719d03a64329 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm64-stub.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm64-stub.c
> @@ -6,17 +6,11 @@
>   * Adapted from ARM version by Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
>   */
>  
> -/*
> - * To prevent the compiler from emitting GOT-indirected (and thus
> absolute)
> - * references to the section markers, override their visibility as
> 'hidden'
> - */
> -#pragma GCC visibility push(hidden)
> -#include <asm/sections.h>
> -#pragma GCC visibility pop
>  
>  #include <linux/efi.h>
>  #include <asm/efi.h>
>  #include <asm/memory.h>
> +#include <asm/sections.h>
>  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
>  
>  #include "efistub.h"
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/hidden.h
> b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/hidden.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3493b041f419
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/hidden.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * To prevent the compiler from emitting GOT-indirected (and thus
> absolute)
> + * references to any global symbols, override their visibility as
> 'hidden'
> + */
> +#pragma GCC visibility push(hidden)

I am getting following compiler errors because of this patch while
cross compiling for ARM, ARM64 and RISC-V.

cc1: fatal error: hidden.h: No such file or directory

Adding the following line to cflags solves the issue which indicates
that gcc is not looking at the source file directory for this
particularly include file.

-I$(srctree)/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub

I might have some trick in my build setup. Just posting here to see if
anybody else also seeing the same problem.


-- 
Regards,
Atish

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-24 23:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-10 16:02 [PATCH 00/19] EFI stub early spring cleaning part 2 Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 01/19] efi/libstub/x86: Remove pointless zeroing of apm_bios_info Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 02/19] efi/libstub/x86: Avoid overflowing code32_start on PE entry Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 03/19] efi/libstub: Use hidden visiblity for all source files Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-24 23:15   ` Atish Patra [this message]
2020-02-24 23:36     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-25 19:18       ` Atish Patra
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 04/19] efi/libstub/arm: Relax FDT alignment requirement Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 05/19] efi/libstub: Move memory map handling and allocation routines to mem.c Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 06/19] efi/libstub: Simplify efi_high_alloc() and rename to efi_allocate_pages() Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 07/19] efi/libstub/x86: Incorporate eboot.c into libstub Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 08/19] efi/libstub: Use consistent type names for file I/O protocols Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 09/19] efi/libstub: Move stub specific declarations into efistub.h Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 10/19] efi/libstub/x86: Permit bootparams struct to be allocated above 4 GB Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 11/19] efi/libstub/x86: Permit cmdline data " Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 12/19] efi/libstub: Move efi_random_alloc() into separate source file Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 13/19] efi/libstub: Move get_dram_base() into arm-stub.c Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-17  1:17   ` Atish Patra
2020-02-17  8:37     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-26 23:34       ` Atish Patra
2020-02-27  7:38         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-27  7:48           ` Atish Patra
2020-02-27  7:50             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 14/19] efi/libstub: Move file I/O support code into separate file Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 15/19] efi/libstub: Rewrite file I/O routine Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 16/19] efi/libstub: Take soft and hard memory limits into account for initrd loading Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 17/19] efi/libstub: Clean up command line parsing routine Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 18/19] efi/libstub: Expose LocateDevicePath boot service Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 19/19] efi/libstub: Make the LoadFile EFI protocol accessible Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d3402c42836aca94d1a2ff385c088af605578068.camel@wdc.com \
    --to=atish.patra@wdc.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).