From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E09C3A5A4 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 12:07:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDB5421721 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 12:07:07 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CDB5421721 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46KdWX2D9qzDqxX for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 22:07:04 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.220.15; helo=mx1.suse.de; envelope-from=dsterba@suse.cz; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46KdWR3DF2zDqvL for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 22:06:57 +1000 (AEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3E4B662; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 12:06:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id 4079DDA809; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:07:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:07:14 +0200 From: David Sterba To: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/24] erofs: add on-disk layout Message-ID: <20190830120714.GN2752@twin.jikos.cz> Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Joe Perches , Gao Xiang , Christoph Hellwig , Alexander Viro , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , Stephen Rothwell , Theodore Ts'o , Pavel Machek , Amir Goldstein , "Darrick J . Wong" , Dave Chinner , Jaegeuk Kim , Jan Kara , Linus Torvalds , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, LKML , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, Chao Yu , Miao Xie , Li Guifu , Fang Wei References: <20190802125347.166018-1-gaoxiang25@huawei.com> <20190802125347.166018-2-gaoxiang25@huawei.com> <20190829095954.GB20598@infradead.org> <20190829103252.GA64893@architecture4> <67d6efbbc9ac6db23215660cb970b7ef29dc0c1d.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <67d6efbbc9ac6db23215660cb970b7ef29dc0c1d.camel@perches.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Cc: Jan Kara , Dave Chinner , LKML , Miao Xie , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Stephen Rothwell , "Darrick J . Wong" , Christoph Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , Amir Goldstein , Alexander Viro , Jaegeuk Kim , Theodore Ts'o , Greg Kroah-Hartman , David Sterba , Pavel Machek , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-erofs" On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 08:58:17AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 18:32 +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > > Hi Christoph, > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 02:59:54AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > +++ b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,316 @@ > > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR Apache-2.0 */ > > > > +/* > > > > + * linux/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h > > > > > > Please remove the pointless file names in the comment headers. > > > > Already removed in the latest version. > > > > > > +struct erofs_super_block { > > > > +/* 0 */__le32 magic; /* in the little endian */ > > > > +/* 4 */__le32 checksum; /* crc32c(super_block) */ > > > > +/* 8 */__le32 features; /* (aka. feature_compat) */ > > > > +/* 12 */__u8 blkszbits; /* support block_size == PAGE_SIZE only */ > > > > > > Please remove all the byte offset comments. That is something that can > > > easily be checked with gdb or pahole. > > > > I have no idea the actual issue here. > > It will help all developpers better add fields or calculate > > these offsets in their mind, and with care. > > > > Rather than they didn't run "gdb" or "pahole" and change it by mistake. > > I think Christoph is not right here. > > Using external tools for validation is extra work > when necessary for understanding the code. The advantage of using the external tools that the information about offsets is provably correct ... > The expected offset is somewhat valuable, but > perhaps the form is a bit off given the visual > run-in to the field types. > > The extra work with this form is manipulating all > the offsets whenever a structure change occurs. ... while this is error prone. > The comments might be better with a form more like: > > struct erofs_super_block { /* offset description */ > __le32 magic; /* 0 */ > __le32 checksum; /* 4 crc32c(super_block) */ > __le32 features; /* 8 (aka. feature_compat) */ > __u8 blkszbits; /* 12 support block_size == PAGE_SIZE only */