linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Tso" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>,
	Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Subject: [patch V2 7/7] fs/jbd2: Free journal head outside of locked region
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 03:01:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190801010944.549462805@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20190801010126.245731659@linutronix.de

On PREEMPT_RT bit-spinlocks have the same semantics as on PREEMPT_RT=n,
i.e. they disable preemption. That means functions which are not safe to be
called in preempt disabled context on RT trigger a might_sleep() assert.

The journal head bit spinlock is mostly held for short code sequences with
trivial RT safe functionality, except for one place:

jbd2_journal_put_journal_head() invokes __journal_remove_journal_head()
with the journal head bit spinlock held. __journal_remove_journal_head()
invokes kmem_cache_free() which must not be called with preemption disabled
on RT.

Jan suggested to rework the removal function so the actual free happens
outside the bit-spinlocked region.

Split it into two parts:

  - Do the sanity checks and the buffer head detach under the lock

  - Do the actual free after dropping the lock

There is error case handling in the free part which needs to dereference
the b_size field of the now detached buffer head. Due to paranoia (caused
by ignorance) the size is retrieved in the detach function and handed into
the free function. Might be over-engineered, but better safe than sorry.

This makes the journal head bit-spinlock usage RT compliant and also avoids
nested locking which is not covered by lockdep.

Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
---
V2: New patch
---
 fs/jbd2/journal.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
@@ -2521,9 +2521,10 @@ struct journal_head *jbd2_journal_grab_j
 	return jh;
 }
 
-static void __journal_remove_journal_head(struct buffer_head *bh)
+static size_t __journal_remove_journal_head(struct buffer_head *bh)
 {
 	struct journal_head *jh = bh2jh(bh);
+	size_t b_size = READ_ONCE(bh->b_size);
 
 	J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_jcount >= 0);
 	J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction == NULL);
@@ -2533,17 +2534,25 @@ static void __journal_remove_journal_hea
 	J_ASSERT_BH(bh, buffer_jbd(bh));
 	J_ASSERT_BH(bh, jh2bh(jh) == bh);
 	BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "remove journal_head");
+
+	/* Unlink before dropping the lock */
+	bh->b_private = NULL;
+	jh->b_bh = NULL;	/* debug, really */
+	clear_buffer_jbd(bh);
+
+	return b_size;
+}
+
+static void journal_release_journal_head(struct journal_head *jh, size_t b_size)
+{
 	if (jh->b_frozen_data) {
 		printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: freeing b_frozen_data\n", __func__);
-		jbd2_free(jh->b_frozen_data, bh->b_size);
+		jbd2_free(jh->b_frozen_data, b_size);
 	}
 	if (jh->b_committed_data) {
 		printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: freeing b_committed_data\n", __func__);
-		jbd2_free(jh->b_committed_data, bh->b_size);
+		jbd2_free(jh->b_committed_data, b_size);
 	}
-	bh->b_private = NULL;
-	jh->b_bh = NULL;	/* debug, really */
-	clear_buffer_jbd(bh);
 	journal_free_journal_head(jh);
 }
 
@@ -2559,11 +2568,14 @@ void jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(struc
 	J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_jcount > 0);
 	--jh->b_jcount;
 	if (!jh->b_jcount) {
-		__journal_remove_journal_head(bh);
+		size_t b_size = __journal_remove_journal_head(bh);
+
 		jbd_unlock_bh_journal_head(bh);
+		journal_release_journal_head(jh, b_size);
 		__brelse(bh);
-	} else
+	} else {
 		jbd_unlock_bh_journal_head(bh);
+	}
 }
 
 /*



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-01  1:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-01  1:01 [patch V2 0/7] fs: Substitute bit-spinlocks for PREEMPT_RT and debugging Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01  1:01 ` [patch V2 1/7] locking/lockdep: Add Kconfig option for bit spinlocks Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01  1:01 ` [patch V2 2/7] fs/buffer: Move BH_Uptodate_Lock locking into wrapper functions Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01  1:01 ` [patch V2 3/7] fs/buffer: Substitute BH_Uptodate_Lock for RT and bit spinlock debugging Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01  1:01 ` [patch V2 4/7] fs/jbd2: Remove jbd_trylock_bh_state() Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01  9:00   ` Jan Kara
2019-08-01  1:01 ` [patch V2 5/7] fs/jbd2: Simplify journal_unmap_buffer() Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01  9:04   ` Jan Kara
2019-08-01  1:01 ` [patch V2 6/7] fs/jbd2: Make state lock a spinlock Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 11:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-02 13:31     ` Jan Kara
2019-08-01 17:57   ` Jan Kara
2019-08-01 18:12     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-02 13:37       ` Jan Kara
2019-08-02 15:29         ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01  1:01 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2019-08-01  9:22   ` [patch V2 7/7] fs/jbd2: Free journal head outside of locked region Jan Kara
2019-08-01 18:08     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-02  7:56 ` [patch V2 0/7] fs: Substitute bit-spinlocks for PREEMPT_RT and debugging Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-02  9:07   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-06  6:11     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-08  7:02       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-08  7:28         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-08  7:54           ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-10  8:18             ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-11  1:22               ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-08-20 17:16               ` Sebastian Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190801010944.549462805@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=julia@ni.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark@fasheh.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).