From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>,
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] ubifs: don't trigger assertion on invalid no-key filename
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 12:14:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200124201317.GC41762@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200122003014.GA180824@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 04:30:15PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 02:31:59PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> >
> > If userspace provides an invalid fscrypt no-key filename which encodes a
> > hash value with any of the UBIFS node type bits set (i.e. the high 3
> > bits), gracefully report ENOENT rather than triggering ubifs_assert().
> >
> > Test case with kvm-xfstests shell:
> >
> > . fs/ubifs/config
> > . ~/xfstests/common/encrypt
> > dev=$(__blkdev_to_ubi_volume /dev/vdc)
> > ubiupdatevol $dev -t
> > mount $dev /mnt -t ubifs
> > mkdir /mnt/edir
> > xfs_io -c set_encpolicy /mnt/edir
> > rm /mnt/edir/_,,,,,DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
> >
> > With the bug, the following assertion fails on the 'rm' command:
> >
> > [ 19.066048] UBIFS error (ubi0:0 pid 379): ubifs_assert_failed: UBIFS assert failed: !(hash & ~UBIFS_S_KEY_HASH_MASK), in fs/ubifs/key.h:170
> >
> > Fixes: f4f61d2cc6d8 ("ubifs: Implement encrypted filenames")
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.10+
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
>
> Richard, can you review the two UBIFS patches in this series, and if you're okay
> with them, provide Acked-by's so that we can take them through the fscrypt tree?
> They don't conflict with anything currently in the UBIFS tree.
>
Richard, any objection to us taking these patches through the fscrypt tree?
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-24 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-20 22:31 [PATCH v5 0/6] fscrypt preparations for encryption+casefolding Eric Biggers
2020-01-20 22:31 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] fscrypt: don't allow v1 policies with casefolding Eric Biggers
2020-01-20 22:31 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] fscrypt: derive dirhash key for casefolded directories Eric Biggers
2020-01-20 22:31 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] fscrypt: clarify what is meant by a per-file key Eric Biggers
2020-01-22 1:16 ` Daniel Rosenberg
2020-01-20 22:31 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] ubifs: don't trigger assertion on invalid no-key filename Eric Biggers
2020-01-22 0:30 ` Eric Biggers
2020-01-24 20:14 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2020-01-20 22:32 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] ubifs: allow both hash and disk name to be provided in no-key names Eric Biggers
2020-01-20 22:32 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] fscrypt: improve format of " Eric Biggers
2020-01-22 23:06 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] fscrypt preparations for encryption+casefolding Eric Biggers
2020-01-23 21:35 ` Daniel Rosenberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200124201317.GC41762@gmail.com \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=drosen@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=krisman@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).