From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
fdmanana@gmail.com, dsterba@suse.cz, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: always fall back to buffered I/O after invalidation failures, was: Re: [PATCH 2/6] iomap: IOMAP_DIO_RWF_NO_STALE_PAGECACHE return if page invalidation fails
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:03:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200710160337.GA21808@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200709225936.GZ2005@dread.disaster.area>
This looks sane - slightly updated version below to not bother with
the ret and a few tidyups.
That being said and to get back to the discussion in this thread:
I think it would be saner to give up on direct I/O in case of the
invalidation failure. I've cooked up a patch on top of this one
(for which I had a few trivial cleanups). It is still under testing,
but I'll send the two out in a new thread.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-10 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200629192353.20841-1-rgoldwyn@suse.de>
[not found] ` <20200629192353.20841-3-rgoldwyn@suse.de>
2020-07-01 7:53 ` always fall back to buffered I/O after invalidation failures, was: Re: [PATCH 2/6] iomap: IOMAP_DIO_RWF_NO_STALE_PAGECACHE return if page invalidation fails Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-07 12:43 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2020-07-07 12:57 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-07 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-08 6:51 ` Dave Chinner
2020-07-08 13:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-08 16:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-08 17:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-09 8:26 ` [Cluster-devel] " Steven Whitehouse
2020-07-09 2:25 ` Dave Chinner
2020-07-09 16:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-09 17:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-09 17:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-09 22:59 ` Dave Chinner
2020-07-10 16:03 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-07-12 11:36 ` Avi Kivity
2020-07-07 13:49 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2020-07-07 14:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-07 14:30 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200710160337.GA21808@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).