From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13ACBC433FF for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:05:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D829D206A2; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:05:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="M8mZIwUW"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="W7t1HoQ2"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="q7s8xYEu" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D829D206A2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hsWVY-0005dz-F5; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:05:56 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hsWVX-0005do-94 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:05:55 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KMz9UZfY5NrVye3vYuGh37L5iEyCDY9riDXZ47Y5pSw=; b=M8mZIwUWHCjXNoKrfv9pw0UQNY SOatuSM2jGmTLS4KWrF6nLKSDCAmd0K+0cPtKMUxkmeYvWJrNkxU5J/PPhhCVbBLZ+j5nkkRUx0q6 olQ7PNcmIsnKbnPoxkiBKppv/lI/8E60wPpOf2hG+JJAkPgtzdCxPg++/FvdxVJxoa+c=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KMz9UZfY5NrVye3vYuGh37L5iEyCDY9riDXZ47Y5pSw=; b=W7t1HoQ2w1x/Ihb2xTgyNKXKsZ TSvCVDbkGsZZSG3D0a29K+SkgbKAKhYXjDyanScDUOLvxwkdXliC5nEu/HQlit7shUmTbJzJ9jpqv DlEEF1LgSgt9P7ynQSUV9DRJROfCzhM9+TmvkWwIMcjFyT7JJILbsu2ZLWIATskc1Ev8=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1hsWVU-004ZbQ-W5 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:05:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.0.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21E23206A2; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:05:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1564509947; bh=JiPzFNptGZecEI72AnXbmIRhLTfjmexxpWzCIrWo9KA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=q7s8xYEuWjMsuH0Cpk+qeVqq/jG+9bBqHCCxZ/YECHcBKSM5bRzoN0NTWeUyLBwrp L34fRL0sFjMwH0zXw2VvGtjjIQc83/xbKx1Xdyumg0X2wcUiYli9t81Xyp7MkuN52V nkR3shtIxTgZl4sJDyczAdEhP5zcyS1wqmiNbjW4= Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:05:46 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Ju Hyung Park Message-ID: <20190730180546.GC76478@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> References: <20190711150617.124660-1-qkrwngud825@gmail.com> <20190711170647.GA65508@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <24f7940d-325c-c2b3-608e-ce311db2dc7d@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) X-Headers-End: 1hsWVU-004ZbQ-W5 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: use kmem_cache pool during xattr lookups X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 07/29, Ju Hyung Park wrote: > Hi Chao and Jaegeuk, > > I have no idea how that patch got merged. > > We(me and Yaro) were supposed to work on doing some finishing touches > to the patch before sending it to upstream. > > I'll personally check with Yaro. > > Jaegeuk, please remove the patch. > That patch has numerous issues, biggest one being hardcoded size(SZ_256). That branch is for testing purpose and kinda TODO list for me. :) Anyway, I'll remove it, so please post it later with better shape. Thanks, > > Also, I need to figure out how to allocate kmem cache per mounts. > > Thanks. > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 4:28 PM Chao Yu wrote: > > > > Hi Jaegeuk, Ju Hyung, Yaroslav, > > > > I can see "f2fs: xattr: reserve cache for xattr allocations" has been merged in > > dev-test branch, however, it doesn't exist in f2fs mailing list, so I can not > > comment on it.... Can anyone send it to the list? > > > > Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel