From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/9] block: Enhance blk_revalidate_disk_zones()
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 08:10:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc7bb317-28ec-dea7-a317-9936bda801b2@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191108015702.233102-2-damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
On 11/8/19 2:56 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> For ZBC and ZAC zoned devices, the scsi driver revalidation processing
> implemented by sd_revalidate_disk() includes a call to
> sd_zbc_read_zones() which executes a full disk zone report used to
> check that all zones of the disk are the same size. This processing is
> followed by a call to blk_revalidate_disk_zones(), used to initialize
> the device request queue zone bitmaps (zone type and zone write lock
> bitmaps). To do so, blk_revalidate_disk_zones() also executes a full
> device zone report to obtain zone types. As a result, the entire
> zoned block device revalidation process includes two full device zone
> report.
>
> By moving the zone size checks into blk_revalidate_disk_zones(), this
> process can be optimized to a single full device zone report, leading to
> shorter device scan and revalidation times. This patch implements this
> optimization, reducing the original full device zone report implemented
> in sd_zbc_check_zones() to a single, small, report zones command
> execution to obtain the size of the first zone of the device. Checks
> whether all zones of the device are the same size as the first zone
> size are moved to the generic blk_check_zone() function called from
> blk_revalidate_disk_zones().
>
> This optimization also has the following benefits:
> 1) fewer memory allocations in the scsi layer during disk revalidation
> as the potentailly large buffer for zone report execution is not
> needed.
> 2) Implement zone checks in a generic manner, reducing the burden on
> device driver which only need to obtain the zone size and check that
> this size is a power of 2 number of LBAs. Any new type of zoned
> block device will benefit from this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
> ---
> block/blk-zoned.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c | 107 ++++++++----------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 247165 (AG München), GF: Felix Imendörffer
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-08 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-08 1:56 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 0/9] Zoned block device enhancements and zone report rework Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08 1:56 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/9] block: Enhance blk_revalidate_disk_zones() Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08 6:28 ` [f2fs-dev] [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-08 7:10 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2019-11-08 1:56 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/9] block: cleanup the !zoned case in blk_revalidate_disk_zones Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08 7:11 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08 18:50 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-11-08 1:56 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/9] block: Simplify report zones execution Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08 7:12 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08 1:56 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/9] block: Remove partition support for zoned block devices Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08 6:30 ` [f2fs-dev] [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-08 7:17 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08 7:28 ` Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08 1:56 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 5/9] null_blk: clean up the block device operations Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08 7:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08 18:47 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-11-08 1:56 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 6/9] null_blk: clean up report zones Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08 7:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08 18:47 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-11-08 1:57 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 7/9] null_blk: Add zone_nr_conv to features Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08 7:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08 18:48 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-11-08 1:57 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 8/9] scsi: sd_zbc: Cleanup sd_zbc_alloc_report_buffer() Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08 6:31 ` [f2fs-dev] [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-08 7:20 ` [f2fs-dev] " Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08 19:06 ` [f2fs-dev] [dm-devel] " Bart Van Assche
2019-11-09 2:54 ` Damien Le Moal
2019-11-09 3:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-08 1:57 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 9/9] block: rework zone reporting Damien Le Moal
2019-11-08 7:23 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-11-08 15:16 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bc7bb317-28ec-dea7-a317-9936bda801b2@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).