From: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@azazel.net>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, ebiggers@kernel.org,
jaegeuk@kernel.org, yuchao0@huawei.com, hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 03/13] fsverity: Add call back to decide if verity check has to be performed
Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 18:03:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1679959.ODoryAfBfi@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190430211037.GA30337@azazel.net>
On Wednesday, May 1, 2019 2:40:38 AM IST Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> On 2019-04-28, at 10:01:11 +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> > Ext4 and F2FS store verity metadata in data extents (beyond
> > inode->i_size) associated with a file. But other filesystems might
> > choose alternative means to store verity metadata. Hence this commit
> > adds a callback function pointer to 'struct fsverity_operations' to
> > help in deciding if verity operation needs to performed against a
> > page-cache page holding file data.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > fs/ext4/super.c | 6 ++++++
> > fs/f2fs/super.c | 6 ++++++
> > fs/read_callbacks.c | 4 +++-
> > include/linux/fsverity.h | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > index aba724f82cc3..63d73b360f1d 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > @@ -1428,10 +1428,16 @@ static struct page *ext4_read_verity_metadata_page(struct inode *inode,
> > return read_mapping_page(inode->i_mapping, index, NULL);
> > }
> >
> > +static bool ext4_verity_required(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index)
> > +{
> > + return index < (i_size_read(inode) + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct fsverity_operations ext4_verityops = {
> > .set_verity = ext4_set_verity,
> > .get_metadata_end = ext4_get_verity_metadata_end,
> > .read_metadata_page = ext4_read_verity_metadata_page,
> > + .verity_required = ext4_verity_required,
> > };
> > #endif /* CONFIG_FS_VERITY */
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > index 2f75f06c784a..cd1299e1f92d 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > @@ -2257,10 +2257,16 @@ static struct page *f2fs_read_verity_metadata_page(struct inode *inode,
> > return read_mapping_page(inode->i_mapping, index, NULL);
> > }
> >
> > +static bool f2fs_verity_required(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index)
> > +{
> > + return index < (i_size_read(inode) + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct fsverity_operations f2fs_verityops = {
> > .set_verity = f2fs_set_verity,
> > .get_metadata_end = f2fs_get_verity_metadata_end,
> > .read_metadata_page = f2fs_read_verity_metadata_page,
> > + .verity_required = f2fs_verity_required,
> > };
> > #endif /* CONFIG_FS_VERITY */
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/read_callbacks.c b/fs/read_callbacks.c
> > index b6d5b95e67d7..6dea54b0baa9 100644
> > --- a/fs/read_callbacks.c
> > +++ b/fs/read_callbacks.c
> > @@ -86,7 +86,9 @@ struct read_callbacks_ctx *get_read_callbacks_ctx(struct inode *inode,
> > read_callbacks_steps |= 1 << STEP_DECRYPT;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_FS_VERITY
> > if (inode->i_verity_info != NULL &&
> > - (index < ((i_size_read(inode) + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT)))
> > + ((inode->i_sb->s_vop->verity_required
> > + && inode->i_sb->s_vop->verity_required(inode, index))
> > + || (inode->i_sb->s_vop->verity_required == NULL)))
>
> I think this is a bit easier to follow:
>
> (inode->i_sb->s_vop->verity_required == NULL ||
> inode->i_sb->s_vop->verity_required(inode, index)))
Yes, you are right. I will implement the changes suggested by you.
--
chandan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-01 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-28 4:31 [PATCH V2 00/13] Consolidate FS read I/O callbacks code Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-28 4:31 ` [PATCH V2 01/13] ext4: Clear BH_Uptodate flag on decryption error Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-28 4:31 ` [PATCH V2 02/13] Consolidate "read callbacks" into a new file Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-30 0:00 ` Eric Biggers
2019-05-01 12:30 ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-30 1:37 ` Chao Yu
2019-05-01 12:31 ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-30 18:05 ` Eric Biggers
2019-05-01 12:32 ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-28 4:31 ` [PATCH V2 03/13] fsverity: Add call back to decide if verity check has to be performed Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-30 21:10 ` Jeremy Sowden
2019-05-01 12:33 ` Chandan Rajendra [this message]
2019-04-28 4:31 ` [PATCH V2 04/13] fsverity: Add call back to determine readpage limit Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-28 4:31 ` [PATCH V2 05/13] fs/mpage.c: Integrate read callbacks Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-28 4:31 ` [PATCH V2 06/13] ext4: Wire up ext4_readpage[s] to use mpage_readpage[s] Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-28 4:31 ` [PATCH V2 07/13] Add decryption support for sub-pagesized blocks Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-30 0:38 ` Eric Biggers
2019-05-01 13:40 ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-28 4:31 ` [PATCH V2 08/13] ext4: Decrypt all boundary blocks when doing buffered write Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-28 4:31 ` [PATCH V2 09/13] ext4: Decrypt the block that needs to be partially zeroed Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-28 4:31 ` [PATCH V2 10/13] fscrypt_encrypt_page: Loop across all blocks mapped by a page range Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-30 17:11 ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-30 23:08 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2019-05-01 14:49 ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-05-01 22:29 ` Eric Biggers
2019-05-02 5:52 ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-05-02 18:16 ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-28 4:31 ` [PATCH V2 11/13] ext4: Compute logical block and the page range to be encrypted Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-30 17:01 ` Eric Biggers
2019-05-01 14:11 ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-28 4:31 ` [PATCH V2 12/13] fscrypt_zeroout_range: Encrypt all zeroed out blocks of a page Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-30 16:51 ` Eric Biggers
2019-05-01 14:22 ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-28 4:31 ` [PATCH V2 13/13] ext4: Enable encryption for subpage-sized blocks Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-30 0:27 ` [PATCH V2 00/13] Consolidate FS read I/O callbacks code Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1679959.ODoryAfBfi@localhost.localdomain \
--to=chandan@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jeremy@azazel.net \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).