From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:57014 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751160AbeC0AEW (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:04:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 17:04:21 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Omar Sandoval Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , kernel-team@fb.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] loop: use interruptible lock in ioctls Message-ID: <20180327000421.GC10054@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <7ec1489d2ca54e886713efe5beb6dd379c2279b6.1522106130.git.osandov@fb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7ec1489d2ca54e886713efe5beb6dd379c2279b6.1522106130.git.osandov@fb.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 04:16:26PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote: > Even after the previous patch to drop lo_ctl_mutex while calling > vfs_getattr(), there are other cases where we can end up sleeping for a > long time while holding lo_ctl_mutex. Let's avoid the uninterruptible > sleep from the ioctls. Umm ... you want these ioctls to return -EINTR just because you resized an xterm? I think you really meant mutex_lock_killable().