linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] dm: prevent DAX mounts if not supported
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 15:36:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180525213647.GA3521@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180525195410.GA11008@redhat.com>

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:54:10PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Thu, May 24 2018 at 10:55pm -0400,
> Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Currently the code in dm_dax_direct_access() only checks whether the target
> > type has a direct_access() operation defined, not whether the underlying
> > block devices all support DAX.  This latter property can be seen by looking
> > at whether we set the QUEUE_FLAG_DAX request queue flag when creating the
> > DM device.
> > 
> > This is problematic if we have, for example, a dm-linear device made up of
> > a PMEM namespace in fsdax mode followed by a ramdisk from BRD.
> > QUEUE_FLAG_DAX won't be set on the dm-linear device's request queue, but
> > we have a working direct_access() entry point and the first member of the
> > dm-linear set *does* support DAX.
> > 
> > This allows the user to create a filesystem on the dm-linear device, and
> > then mount it with DAX.  The filesystem's bdev_dax_supported() test will
> > pass because it'll operate on the first member of the dm-linear device,
> > which happens to be a fsdax PMEM namespace.
> > 
> > All DAX I/O will then fail to that dm-linear device because the lack of
> > QUEUE_FLAG_DAX prevents fs_dax_get_by_bdev() from working.  This means that
> > the struct dax_device isn't ever set in the filesystem, so
> > dax_direct_access() will always return -EOPNOTSUPP.
> > 
> > By failing out of dm_dax_direct_access() if QUEUE_FLAG_DAX isn't set we let
> > the filesystem know we don't support DAX at mount time.  The filesystem
> > will then silently fall back and remove the dax mount option, causing it to
> > work properly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> > Fixes: commit 545ed20e6df6 ("dm: add infrastructure for DAX support")
> > ---
> >  drivers/md/dm.c | 5 ++---
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
> > index 0a7b0107ca78..9728433362d1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
> > @@ -1050,14 +1050,13 @@ static long dm_dax_direct_access(struct dax_device *dax_dev, pgoff_t pgoff,
> >  
> >  	if (!ti)
> >  		goto out;
> > -	if (!ti->type->direct_access)
> > +	if (!blk_queue_dax(md->queue))
> >  		goto out;
> >  	len = max_io_len(sector, ti) / PAGE_SECTORS;
> >  	if (len < 1)
> >  		goto out;
> >  	nr_pages = min(len, nr_pages);
> > -	if (ti->type->direct_access)
> > -		ret = ti->type->direct_access(ti, pgoff, nr_pages, kaddr, pfn);
> > +	ret = ti->type->direct_access(ti, pgoff, nr_pages, kaddr, pfn);
> 
> So I followed all the rationale for this patch.  But the last change
> doesn't make any sense.  We should still verify that the target has
> ti->type->direct_access before calling it.  So please reinstate that
> check before calling it.

You know that type has direct_access() via the blk_queue_dax() check.  This
tells you not only that the target has direct_access(), but also that you've
successfully checked all members of that DM device and they all have working
DAX I/O paths, etc.  This is all done via the bdev_dax_supported() check and
the rest of the code in dm_table_supports_dax() and device_supports_dax().

If this is too subtle I can add a comment or add the check back.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-25 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-25  2:55 [PATCH 0/7] Fix DM DAX handling Ross Zwisler
2018-05-25  2:55 ` [PATCH 1/7] fs: allow per-device dax status checking for filesystems Ross Zwisler
2018-05-25  5:02   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-25 15:42     ` Ross Zwisler
2018-05-25 19:23       ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-26 14:07   ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-25  2:55 ` [PATCH 2/7] dax: change bdev_dax_supported() to support boolean returns Ross Zwisler
2018-05-25  5:01   ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-25  2:55 ` [PATCH 3/7] dm: fix test for DAX device support Ross Zwisler
2018-05-25  2:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] dm: prevent DAX mounts if not supported Ross Zwisler
2018-05-25 19:54   ` Mike Snitzer
2018-05-25 21:36     ` Ross Zwisler [this message]
2018-05-25  2:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] dm: remove DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED dm_queue_mode Ross Zwisler
2018-05-25  2:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] dm-snap: remove unnecessary direct_access() stub Ross Zwisler
2018-05-25  2:55 ` [PATCH 7/7] dm-error: " Ross Zwisler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180525213647.GA3521@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).