linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@primarydata.com>
Cc: "bfields@redhat.com" <bfields@redhat.com>,
	"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] nfsd: clients don't need to break their own delegations
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 15:40:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180906194048.GE12881@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180320160257.GC4288@fieldses.org>

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:02:57PM -0400, bfields@fieldses.org wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 03:13:47PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > Right now, the knfsd threads are regular kernel threads, with each
> > thread appearing to userspace to be a process in its own right.
> > Is there any reason why we could not assign them a group pid that would
> > allow the fl_nspid mechanism to work (i.e. set task->group_leader)?
> 
> Huh, OK, I hadn't thought about that.

Thinking about it: as far as I can tell that's not meant to be modified
on a running thread, so we need to create the thread the right way--all
the nfsd threads need to be children of the same thread.

Currently we're using kthead_create() which makes them all children of
kthreadd.

I spent a little time looking into forking threads from existing nfsd
threads and started to feel like I was duplicating a lot of kthread
code.

So now I wonder if it's possible to generalize kthreadd somehow.

--b.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-07  0:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-19 14:36 [PATCH 00/10] Eliminate delegation self-conflicts v2 J. Bruce Fields
2018-03-19 14:36 ` [PATCH 01/10] vfs: remove unnecessary fl_owner_t typedef J. Bruce Fields
2018-03-19 14:36 ` [PATCH 02/10] nfsd: simplify put of fi_deleg_file J. Bruce Fields
2018-03-19 14:36 ` [PATCH 03/10] nfsd: simplify nfs4_put_deleg_lease calls J. Bruce Fields
2018-03-19 14:36 ` [PATCH 04/10] nfsd4: set fl_owner to delegation, not file pointer J. Bruce Fields
2018-03-19 14:36 ` [PATCH 05/10] nfsd4: dp->dl_stid.sc_file doesn't need locking J. Bruce Fields
2018-03-19 14:36 ` [PATCH 06/10] nfsd: make nfs4_get_existing_delegation less confusing J. Bruce Fields
2018-03-19 14:36 ` [PATCH 07/10] nfsd: factor out common delegation-destruction code J. Bruce Fields
2018-03-19 14:36 ` [PATCH 08/10] nfsd: move sc_file assignment into alloc_init_deleg J. Bruce Fields
2018-03-19 14:36 ` [PATCH 09/10] nfsd: create a separate lease for each delegation J. Bruce Fields
2018-03-19 14:36 ` [PATCH 10/10] nfsd: clients don't need to break their own delegations J. Bruce Fields
2018-03-20 13:10 ` [PATCH 00/10] Eliminate delegation self-conflicts v2 Jeff Layton
2018-03-20 13:35 ` [PATCH 10/10] nfsd: clients don't need to break their own delegations David Howells
2018-03-20 13:46   ` Trond Myklebust
2018-03-20 14:49     ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-03-20 15:13       ` Trond Myklebust
2018-03-20 16:02         ` bfields
2018-09-06 19:40           ` bfields [this message]
2018-03-20 14:52   ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180906194048.GE12881@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=bfields@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).