From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:34752 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726429AbeIKLbY (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 07:31:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 23:33:35 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: Christoph Hellwig , syzbot , bcrl , linux-aio , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs , Al Viro , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: possible deadlock in aio_poll Message-ID: <20180911063335.GA3315@infradead.org> References: <000000000000cbb35d05757f7a3a@google.com> <20180910165317.GA3237@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 08:14:20PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > Why do pollable waitqueues need to disable interrupts generally? Any waitqueue needs to disable interrupts for consistency. We always use spin_lock_irqsave in __wake_up_common_lock() for example.