linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: jbaron@akamai.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, dave@stgolabs.net,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -next 0/6] epoll: some miscellaneous optimizations
Date: Wed,  7 Nov 2018 21:10:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181108051006.18751-1-dave@stgolabs.net> (raw)

Hi,

The following are some incremental optimizations on some of the epoll
core. Each patch has the details, but together, the series is seen
to shave off measurable cycles on a number of systems and workloads.

For example, on a 40-core IB, a pipetest as well as parallel epoll_wait()
benchmark show around a 20-30% increase in raw operations per second when
the box is fully occupied (incremental thread counts), and up to 15%
performance improvement with lower counts.

Passes ltp epoll related testcases. Please consider for v4.21/5.0.

Thanks!

Davidlohr Bueso (6):
  fs/epoll: remove max_nests argument from ep_call_nested()
  fs/epoll: simplify ep_send_events_proc() ready-list loop
  fs/epoll: drop ovflist branch prediction
  fs/epoll: robustify ep->mtx held checks
  fs/epoll: reduce the scope of wq lock in epoll_wait()
  fs/epoll: avoid barrier after an epoll_wait(2) timeout

 fs/eventpoll.c | 206 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)

-- 
2.16.4

             reply	other threads:[~2018-11-08 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-08  5:10 Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2018-11-08  5:10 ` [PATCH 1/6] fs/epoll: remove max_nests argument from ep_call_nested() Davidlohr Bueso
2018-11-08  5:10 ` [PATCH 2/6] fs/epoll: simplify ep_send_events_proc() ready-list loop Davidlohr Bueso
2018-11-08  5:10 ` [PATCH 3/6] fs/epoll: drop ovflist branch prediction Davidlohr Bueso
2018-11-08  5:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] fs/epoll: robustify ep->mtx held checks Davidlohr Bueso
2018-11-08  5:10 ` [PATCH 5/6] fs/epoll: reduce the scope of wq lock in epoll_wait() Davidlohr Bueso
2018-11-09 15:52   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-11-08  5:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] fs/epoll: avoid barrier after an epoll_wait(2) timeout Davidlohr Bueso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181108051006.18751-1-dave@stgolabs.net \
    --to=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).