From: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com>,
tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, ebiggers@kernel.org,
jaegeuk@kernel.org, yuchao0@huawei.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 14/14] ext4: Enable encryption for subpage-sized blocks
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 22:40:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190412171041.31995-15-chandan@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190412171041.31995-1-chandan@linux.ibm.com>
Now that we have the code to support encryption for subpage-sized
blocks, this commit removes the conditional check in filesystem mount
code.
The commit also changes the support statement in
Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst to reflect the fact that
encryption of filesystems with blocksize less than page size now works.
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst | 4 ++--
fs/ext4/super.c | 7 -------
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst
index 08c23b60e016..ff2fea121da9 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/fscrypt.rst
@@ -213,8 +213,8 @@ Contents encryption
-------------------
For file contents, each filesystem block is encrypted independently.
-Currently, only the case where the filesystem block size is equal to
-the system's page size (usually 4096 bytes) is supported.
+Starting from Linux kernel 5.3, encryption of filesystems with block
+size less than system's page size is supported.
Each block's IV is set to the logical block number within the file as
a little endian number, except that:
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index cadf50f9503f..549e5bec1aba 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -4433,13 +4433,6 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
}
}
- if ((DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED(sbi) || ext4_has_feature_encrypt(sb)) &&
- (blocksize != PAGE_SIZE)) {
- ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
- "Unsupported blocksize for fs encryption");
- goto failed_mount_wq;
- }
-
if (DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED(sbi) && !sb_rdonly(sb) &&
!ext4_has_feature_encrypt(sb)) {
ext4_set_feature_encrypt(sb);
--
2.19.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-12 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-12 17:10 [RFC PATCH 00/14] Consolidate Post read processing code Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-12 17:10 ` [RFC PATCH 01/14] ext4: Clear BH_Uptodate flag on decryption error Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-12 17:10 ` [RFC PATCH 02/14] Consolidate "post read processing" into a new file Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-12 17:10 ` [RFC PATCH 03/14] fsverity: Add call back to decide if verity check has to be performed Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-12 17:10 ` [RFC PATCH 04/14] fsverity: Add call back to determine readpage limit Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-12 17:10 ` [RFC PATCH 05/14] fs/mpage.c: Integrate post read processing Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-12 17:10 ` [RFC PATCH 06/14] ext4: Wire up ext4_readpage[s] to use mpage_readpage[s] Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-12 17:10 ` [RFC PATCH 07/14] Remove the term "bio" from post read processing Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-12 17:10 ` [RFC PATCH 08/14] Add decryption support for sub-pagesized blocks Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-12 17:10 ` [RFC PATCH 09/14] ext4: Decrypt all boundary blocks when doing buffered write Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-12 17:10 ` [RFC PATCH 10/14] ext4: Decrypt the block that needs to be partially zeroed Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-12 17:10 ` [RFC PATCH 11/14] fscrypt_encrypt_page: Loop across all blocks mapped by a page range Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-12 17:10 ` [RFC PATCH 12/14] ext4: Compute logical block and the page range to be encrypted Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-12 17:10 ` [RFC PATCH 13/14] fscrypt_zeroout_range: Encrypt all zeroed out blocks of a page Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-12 17:10 ` Chandan Rajendra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190412171041.31995-15-chandan@linux.ibm.com \
--to=chandan@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).