From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC79C3A59E for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 13:39:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B85222DBF for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 13:39:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731345AbfIBNjX (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Sep 2019 09:39:23 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:3989 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731329AbfIBNjW (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Sep 2019 09:39:22 -0400 Received: from DGGEMM405-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 98EC5C1E173A35FF01AC; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 21:39:18 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggeme762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.108) by DGGEMM405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 21:39:18 +0800 Received: from architecture4 (10.140.130.215) by dggeme762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 21:39:17 +0800 Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 21:38:26 +0800 From: Gao Xiang To: Christoph Hellwig CC: Gao Xiang , Chao Yu , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , , , , Chao Yu Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/21] erofs: kill magic underscores Message-ID: <20190902133826.GB63268@architecture4> References: <20190802125347.166018-1-gaoxiang25@huawei.com> <20190901055130.30572-1-hsiangkao@aol.com> <20190901055130.30572-17-hsiangkao@aol.com> <20190902122627.GN15931@infradead.org> <20190902123937.GA17916@architecture4> <20190902125438.GA17750@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190902125438.GA17750@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Originating-IP: [10.140.130.215] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggeme719-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.115) To dggeme762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.108) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Hi Christoph, On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 05:54:38AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 08:39:37PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > > > > > > > + if (erofs_inode_version(advise) == EROFS_INODE_LAYOUT_V2) { > > > > > > I still need to wade through the old thread - but didn't you say this > > > wasn't really a new vs old version but a compat vs full inode? Maybe > > > the names aren't that suitable either? > > > > Could you kindly give some suggestions for better naming about it? > > there are all supported by EROFS... (Actually we only mainly use v1...) > > Maybe EROFS_INODE_LAYOUT_COMPACT and EROFS_INODE_LAYOUT_EXTENDED? Okay, that is fine. Thanks, Gao Xiang