linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
To: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fs, close_range: add flag CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:26:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201020142632.7wllfigtfgqzoou4@wittgenstein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201019102654.16642-2-gscrivan@redhat.com>

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 12:26:53PM +0200, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
> When the flag CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC is set, close_range doesn't
> immediately close the files but it sets the close-on-exec bit.
> 
> It is useful for e.g. container runtimes that usually install a
> seccomp profile "as late as possible" before execv'ing the container
> process itself.  The container runtime could either do:
>   1                                  2
> - install_seccomp_profile();       - close_range(MIN_FD, MAX_INT, 0);
> - close_range(MIN_FD, MAX_INT, 0); - install_seccomp_profile();
> - execve(...);                     - execve(...);
> 
> Both alternative have some disadvantages.
> 
> In the first variant the seccomp_profile cannot block the close_range
> syscall, as well as opendir/read/close/... for the fallback on older
> kernels).
> In the second variant, close_range() can be used only on the fds
> that are not going to be needed by the runtime anymore, and it must be
> potentially called multiple times to account for the different ranges
> that must be closed.
> 
> Using close_range(..., ..., CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC) solves these issues.
> The runtime is able to use the open fds and the seccomp profile could
> block close_range() and the syscalls used for its fallback.

I see, so you want those fds to be closed after exec but still use them
before. Yeah, this is a good use-case. (I proposed this extension quite a
while ago when we started discussing this syscall. Thanks for working
ont this!)

> 
> Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/file.c                        | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  include/uapi/linux/close_range.h |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
> index 21c0893f2f1d..0295d4f7c5ef 100644
> --- a/fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/file.c
> @@ -672,6 +672,35 @@ int __close_fd(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__close_fd); /* for ksys_close() */
>  
> +static inline void __range_cloexec(struct files_struct *cur_fds,
> +				   unsigned int fd, unsigned int max_fd)
> +{
> +	struct fdtable *fdt;
> +
> +        if (fd > max_fd)
> +		return;

Looks like formatting issues here.

> +
> +	spin_lock(&cur_fds->file_lock);
> +	fdt = files_fdtable(cur_fds);
> +	bitmap_set(fdt->close_on_exec, fd, max_fd - fd + 1);

I think that this is ok and that there's no reason to make this anymore
complex unless we somehow really see performance issues which I doubt.

If Al is ok with doing it this way and doesn't see any obvious issues
I'll be taking this for some testing and would come back to ack this and
pick it up.

> +	spin_unlock(&cur_fds->file_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void __range_close(struct files_struct *cur_fds, unsigned int fd,
> +				 unsigned int max_fd)
> +{
> +	while (fd <= max_fd) {
> +		struct file *file;
> +
> +		file = pick_file(cur_fds, fd++);
> +		if (!file)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		filp_close(file, cur_fds);
> +		cond_resched();
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * __close_range() - Close all file descriptors in a given range.
>   *
> @@ -687,7 +716,7 @@ int __close_range(unsigned fd, unsigned max_fd, unsigned int flags)
>  	struct task_struct *me = current;
>  	struct files_struct *cur_fds = me->files, *fds = NULL;
>  
> -	if (flags & ~CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE)
> +	if (flags & ~(CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE | CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (fd > max_fd)
> @@ -725,16 +754,11 @@ int __close_range(unsigned fd, unsigned max_fd, unsigned int flags)
>  	}
>  
>  	max_fd = min(max_fd, cur_max);
> -	while (fd <= max_fd) {
> -		struct file *file;
>  
> -		file = pick_file(cur_fds, fd++);
> -		if (!file)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		filp_close(file, cur_fds);
> -		cond_resched();
> -	}
> +	if (flags & CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC)
> +		__range_cloexec(cur_fds, fd, max_fd);
> +	else
> +		__range_close(cur_fds, fd, max_fd);
>  
>  	if (fds) {
>  		/*
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/close_range.h b/include/uapi/linux/close_range.h
> index 6928a9fdee3c..2d804281554c 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/close_range.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/close_range.h
> @@ -5,5 +5,8 @@
>  /* Unshare the file descriptor table before closing file descriptors. */
>  #define CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE	(1U << 1)
>  
> +/* Set the FD_CLOEXEC bit instead of closing the file descriptor. */
> +#define CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC	(1U << 2)
> +
>  #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_CLOSE_RANGE_H */
>  
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-20 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-19 10:26 [PATCH v2 0/2] fs, close_range: add flag CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC Giuseppe Scrivano
2020-10-19 10:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Giuseppe Scrivano
2020-10-20 14:26   ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2020-10-19 10:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests: add tests for CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC Giuseppe Scrivano
2020-10-20 14:32   ` Christian Brauner
2020-10-29 15:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] fs, close_range: add flag CLOSE_RANGE_CLOEXEC Christian Brauner
2020-10-29 16:47   ` Giuseppe Scrivano
2020-11-18 10:02     ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201020142632.7wllfigtfgqzoou4@wittgenstein \
    --to=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gscrivan@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).