linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Winston Wen <wentao@uniontech.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Vivek Trivedi <t.vivek@samsung.com>,
	Orion Poplawski <orion@nwra.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fanotify: allow freeze when waiting response for permission events
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 18:59:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240306175918.bvipf63nfk2d3ocw@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BD33543C483B89AB+20240305061804.1186796-1-wentao@uniontech.com>

On Tue 05-03-24 14:18:04, Winston Wen wrote:
> This is a long-standing issue that uninterruptible sleep in fanotify
> could make system hibernation fail if the usperspace server gets frozen
> before the process waiting for the response (as reported e.g. [1][2]).
> 
> A few years ago, there was an attempt to switch to interruptible sleep
> while waiting [3], but that would lead to EINTR returns from open(2)
> and break userspace [4], so it's been changed to only killable [5].
> 
> And the core freezer logic had been rewritten [6][7] in v6.1, allowing
> freezing in uninterrupted sleep, so we can solve this problem now.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1518774280-38090-1-git-send-email-t.vivek@samsung.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c1bb16b7-9eee-9cea-2c96-a512d8b3b9c7@nwra.com/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20190213145443.26836-1-jack@suse.cz/
> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/d0031e3a-f050-0832-fa59-928a80ffd44b@nwra.com/
> [5] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20190221105558.GA20921@quack2.suse.cz/
> [6] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220822114649.055452969@infradead.org/
> [7] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230908-avoid-spurious-freezer-wakeups-v4-0-6155aa3dafae@quicinc.com/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Winston Wen <wentao@uniontech.com>

Thanks and I'm glad this has finally a workable solution (keeping fingers
crossed ;)). I've added the patch to my tree.

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> index 1e4def21811e..285beaf5bc09 100644
> --- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> +++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> @@ -228,8 +228,10 @@ static int fanotify_get_response(struct fsnotify_group *group,
>  
>  	pr_debug("%s: group=%p event=%p\n", __func__, group, event);
>  
> -	ret = wait_event_killable(group->fanotify_data.access_waitq,
> -				  event->state == FAN_EVENT_ANSWERED);
> +	ret = wait_event_state(group->fanotify_data.access_waitq,
> +				  event->state == FAN_EVENT_ANSWERED,
> +				  TASK_KILLABLE|TASK_FREEZABLE);
> +
>  	/* Signal pending? */
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		spin_lock(&group->notification_lock);
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

      reply	other threads:[~2024-03-06 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-05  6:18 [PATCH] fanotify: allow freeze when waiting response for permission events Winston Wen
2024-03-06 17:59 ` Jan Kara [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240306175918.bvipf63nfk2d3ocw@quack3 \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=orion@nwra.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=t.vivek@samsung.com \
    --cc=wentao@uniontech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).