linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao Xu <hao.xu@linux.dev>
To: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm>,
	fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, miklos@szeredi.hu
Subject: Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH] fuse: add a new flag to allow shared mmap in FOPEN_DIRECT_IO mode
Date: Sat, 6 May 2023 13:04:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69015d62-a2c0-3baf-413f-5e229e632a1e@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc6fe539-64ae-aa35-8b6e-3b22e07af31f@fastmail.fm>

On 5/5/23 22:39, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/5/23 10:16, Hao Xu wrote:
>> From: Hao Xu <howeyxu@tencent.com>
>>
>> FOPEN_DIRECT_IO is usually set by fuse daemon to indicate need of strong
>> coherency, e.g. network filesystems. Thus shared mmap is disabled since
>> it leverages page cache and may write to it, which may cause
>> inconsistence. But FOPEN_DIRECT_IO can be used not for coherency but to
>> reduce memory footprint as well, e.g. reduce guest memory usage with
>> virtiofs. Therefore, add a new flag FOPEN_DIRECT_IO_SHARED_MMAP to allow
>> shared mmap for these cases.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <howeyxu@tencent.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/fuse/file.c            | 11 ++++++++---
>>   include/uapi/linux/fuse.h |  2 ++
>>   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
>> index 89d97f6188e0..655896bdb0d5 100644
>> --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
>> @@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ struct fuse_file *fuse_file_open(struct fuse_mount 
>> *fm, u64 nodeid,
>>       }
>>       if (isdir)
>> -        ff->open_flags &= ~FOPEN_DIRECT_IO;
>> +        ff->open_flags &=
>> +            ~(FOPEN_DIRECT_IO | FOPEN_DIRECT_IO_SHARED_MMAP);
>>       ff->nodeid = nodeid;
>> @@ -2509,8 +2510,12 @@ static int fuse_file_mmap(struct file *file, 
>> struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>>           return fuse_dax_mmap(file, vma);
>>       if (ff->open_flags & FOPEN_DIRECT_IO) {
>> -        /* Can't provide the coherency needed for MAP_SHARED */
>> -        if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE)
>> +        /* Can't provide the coherency needed for MAP_SHARED.
>> +         * So disable it if FOPEN_DIRECT_IO_SHARED_MMAP is not
>> +         * set, which means we do need strong coherency.
>> +         */
>> +        if (!(ff->open_flags & FOPEN_DIRECT_IO_SHARED_MMAP) &&
>> +            vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE)
>>               return -ENODEV;
>>           invalidate_inode_pages2(file->f_mapping);
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fuse.h b/include/uapi/linux/fuse.h
>> index 1b9d0dfae72d..003dcf42e8c2 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/fuse.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fuse.h
>> @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ struct fuse_file_lock {
>>    * FOPEN_STREAM: the file is stream-like (no file position at all)
>>    * FOPEN_NOFLUSH: don't flush data cache on close (unless 
>> FUSE_WRITEBACK_CACHE)
>>    * FOPEN_PARALLEL_DIRECT_WRITES: Allow concurrent direct writes on 
>> the same inode
>> + * FOPEN_DIRECT_IO_SHARED_MMAP: allow shared mmap when 
>> FOPEN_DIRECT_IO is set
>>    */
>>   #define FOPEN_DIRECT_IO        (1 << 0)
>>   #define FOPEN_KEEP_CACHE    (1 << 1)
>> @@ -322,6 +323,7 @@ struct fuse_file_lock {
>>   #define FOPEN_STREAM        (1 << 4)
>>   #define FOPEN_NOFLUSH        (1 << 5)
>>   #define FOPEN_PARALLEL_DIRECT_WRITES    (1 << 6)
>> +#define FOPEN_DIRECT_IO_SHARED_MMAP    (1 << 7)
> 
> Thanks, that is what I had in my mind as well.
> 
> I don't have a strong opinion on it (so don't change it before Miklos 
> commented), but maybe FOPEN_DIRECT_IO_WEAK? Just in case there would be 
> later on other conditions that need to be weakened? The comment would 
> say then something like
> "Weakens FOPEN_DIRECT_IO enforcement, allows MAP_SHARED mmap"
> 

make sense for me, thanks, I'll update it in v2 sent after Miklos' review.

> Thanks,
> Bernd
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-06  5:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-05  8:16 [PATCH] fuse: add a new flag to allow shared mmap in FOPEN_DIRECT_IO mode Hao Xu
2023-05-05 14:39 ` [fuse-devel] " Bernd Schubert
2023-05-06  5:04   ` Hao Xu [this message]
2023-05-06  7:03   ` Hao Xu
2023-06-26 17:59     ` Bernd Schubert
2023-05-05 20:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2023-05-06  5:01   ` Hao Xu
2023-05-08  9:36     ` Hao Xu
2023-06-13  2:56     ` Jingbo Xu
2023-06-13  3:20       ` Hao Xu
2023-06-20  4:07         ` Jingbo Xu
2023-05-09 12:59 ` [fuse-devel] " Hao Xu
2023-06-08  7:17 ` Hao Xu
2023-06-08 21:28   ` [fuse-devel] " Bernd Schubert
2023-06-09  5:56     ` Miklos Szeredi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69015d62-a2c0-3baf-413f-5e229e632a1e@linux.dev \
    --to=hao.xu@linux.dev \
    --cc=bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).