From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] mm/swap: optimize swap cache search space
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:14:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bk5uqoem.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANeU7Q=YYFWPBMHPPeOQDxO9=yAiQP8w90e2mO0U+hBuzCV1RQ@mail.gmail.com> (Chris Li's message of "Fri, 26 Apr 2024 16:16:01 -0700")
Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> writes:
> Hi Ying,
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 7:26 PM Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Matthew,
>>
>> Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 03:54:58PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> >> Is it possible to add "start_offset" support in xarray, so "index"
>> >> will subtract "start_offset" before looking up / inserting?
>> >
>> > We kind of have that with XA_FLAGS_ZERO_BUSY which is used for
>> > XA_FLAGS_ALLOC1. But that's just one bit for the entry at 0. We could
>> > generalise it, but then we'd have to store that somewhere and there's
>> > no obvious good place to store it that wouldn't enlarge struct xarray,
>> > which I'd be reluctant to do.
>> >
>> >> Is it possible to use multiple range locks to protect one xarray to
>> >> improve the lock scalability? This is why we have multiple "struct
>> >> address_space" for one swap device. And, we may have same lock
>> >> contention issue for large files too.
>> >
>> > It's something I've considered. The issue is search marks. If we delete
>> > an entry, we may have to walk all the way up the xarray clearing bits as
>> > we go and I'd rather not grab a lock at each level. There's a convenient
>> > 4 byte hole between nr_values and parent where we could put it.
>> >
>> > Oh, another issue is that we use i_pages.xa_lock to synchronise
>> > address_space.nrpages, so I'm not sure that a per-node lock will help.
>>
>> Thanks for looking at this.
>>
>> > But I'm conscious that there are workloads which show contention on
>> > xa_lock as their limiting factor, so I'm open to ideas to improve all
>> > these things.
>>
>> I have no idea so far because my very limited knowledge about xarray.
>
> For the swap file usage, I have been considering an idea to remove the
> index part of the xarray from swap cache. Swap cache is different from
> file cache in a few aspects.
> For one if we want to have a folio equivalent of "large swap entry".
> Then the natural alignment of those swap offset on does not make
> sense. Ideally we should be able to write the folio to un-aligned swap
> file locations.
>
> The other aspect for swap files is that, we already have different
> data structures organized around swap offset, swap_map and
> swap_cgroup. If we group the swap related data structure together. We
> can add a pointer to a union of folio or a shadow swap entry.
The shadow swap entry may be freed. So we need to prepare for that.
And, in current design, only swap_map[] is allocated if the swap space
isn't used. That needs to be considered too.
> We can use atomic updates on the swap struct member or breakdown the
> access lock by ranges just like swap cluster does.
The swap code uses xarray in a simple way. That gives us opportunity to
optimize. For example, it makes it easy to use multiple xarray
instances for one swap device.
> I want to discuss those ideas in the upcoming LSF/MM meet up as well.
Good!
--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-28 1:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-17 16:08 [PATCH 0/8] mm/swap: optimize swap cache search space Kairui Song
2024-04-17 16:08 ` [PATCH 1/8] NFS: remove nfs_page_lengthg and usage of page_index Kairui Song
2024-04-17 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/8] nilfs2: drop " Kairui Song
2024-04-17 16:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-18 2:42 ` Kairui Song
2024-04-17 16:08 ` [PATCH 3/8] f2fs: " Kairui Song
2024-04-17 16:08 ` [PATCH 4/8] ceph: " Kairui Song
2024-04-18 0:28 ` Xiubo Li
2024-04-18 1:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-18 1:40 ` Xiubo Li
2024-04-22 15:34 ` Kairui Song
2024-04-23 0:32 ` Xiubo Li
2024-04-17 16:08 ` [PATCH 5/8] cifs: drop usage of page_file_offset Kairui Song
2024-04-17 16:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-17 16:08 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm/swap: get the swap file offset directly Kairui Song
2024-04-18 18:43 ` kernel test robot
2024-04-23 1:41 ` Huang, Ying
2024-04-23 13:33 ` Kairui Song
2024-04-17 16:08 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm: drop page_index/page_file_offset and convert swap helpers to use folio Kairui Song
2024-04-18 1:55 ` Barry Song
2024-04-18 2:42 ` Kairui Song
2024-04-18 10:19 ` Barry Song
2024-04-18 3:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-18 3:55 ` Barry Song
2024-04-17 16:08 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm/swap: reduce swap cache search space Kairui Song
2024-04-18 18:21 ` kernel test robot
2024-04-18 18:21 ` kernel test robot
2024-04-22 7:54 ` [PATCH 0/8] mm/swap: optimize " Huang, Ying
2024-04-22 15:20 ` Kairui Song
2024-04-23 1:29 ` Huang, Ying
2024-04-23 3:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-24 2:24 ` Huang, Ying
2024-04-26 23:16 ` Chris Li
2024-04-28 1:14 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2024-04-28 2:43 ` Chris Li
2024-04-28 3:21 ` Huang, Ying
2024-04-28 17:26 ` Chris Li
2024-04-28 17:37 ` Kairui Song
2024-04-28 17:45 ` Kairui Song
2024-04-29 5:50 ` Chris Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bk5uqoem.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=ryncsn@gmail.com \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).