linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kyle Sanderson <kyle.leet@gmail.com>
To: miklos@szeredi.hu, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, michael+lkml@stapelberg.ch
Subject: Re: Still a pretty bad time on 5.4.6 with fuse_request_end.
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:29:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACsaVZJ7V8hefM+dxY7Rgf8RR7jqcnJgZt+zgT+KM+UQwT7U2g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Greg: can we take take this to stable for 5.4.22?

> Attached patch should fix it, though I haven't tested it.

Confirmed - sounds good over my system for the past 8 days of heavy
usage with 5.4.19.

Thank you very much for the fix Miklos and to you Michael for working
with him (my mail setup is incomplete - hopefully this doesn't fork
the thread...).

Tested-by: Kyle Sanderson <kyle.leet@gmail.com>

Can you land this for linux-next Miklos please.

Kyle.

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:38 AM Michael Stapelberg
<michael+lkml@stapelberg.ch> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately not: when I change the code like so:
>
>     bool async;
>     uint32_t opcode_early = req->args->opcode;
>
>     if (test_and_set_bit(FR_FINISHED, &req->flags))
>         goto put_request;
>
>     async = req->args->end;
>
> …gdb only reports:
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0x000000a700000001 in ?? ()
> #1  0xffffffff8137fc99 in fuse_copy_finish (cs=0x20000ffffffff) at
> fs/fuse/dev.c:681
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
>
> But maybe that’s a hint in and of itself?

Yep, it's a stack use after return bug.   Attached patch should fix
it, though I haven't tested it.

Thanks,
Miklos
---
 fs/fuse/dev.c    |    6 +++---
 fs/fuse/fuse_i.h |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -276,12 +276,10 @@ static void flush_bg_queue(struct fuse_c
 void fuse_request_end(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_req *req)
 {
  struct fuse_iqueue *fiq = &fc->iq;
- bool async;

  if (test_and_set_bit(FR_FINISHED, &req->flags))
  goto put_request;

- async = req->args->end;
  /*
  * test_and_set_bit() implies smp_mb() between bit
  * changing and below intr_entry check. Pairs with
@@ -324,7 +322,7 @@ void fuse_request_end(struct fuse_conn *
  wake_up(&req->waitq);
  }

- if (async)
+ if (test_bit(FR_ASYNC, &req->flags))
  req->args->end(fc, req->args, req->out.h.error);
 put_request:
  fuse_put_request(fc, req);
@@ -471,6 +469,8 @@ static void fuse_args_to_req(struct fuse
  req->in.h.opcode = args->opcode;
  req->in.h.nodeid = args->nodeid;
  req->args = args;
+ if (args->end)
+ set_bit(FR_ASYNC, &req->flags);
 }

 ssize_t fuse_simple_request(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_args *args)
--- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
+++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
@@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ struct fuse_io_priv {
  * FR_SENT: request is in userspace, waiting for an answer
  * FR_FINISHED: request is finished
  * FR_PRIVATE: request is on private list
+ * FR_ASYNC: request is asynchronous
  */
 enum fuse_req_flag {
  FR_ISREPLY,
@@ -314,6 +315,7 @@ enum fuse_req_flag {
  FR_SENT,
  FR_FINISHED,
  FR_PRIVATE,
+ FR_ASYNC,
 };

 /**

             reply	other threads:[~2020-02-22 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-22 19:29 Kyle Sanderson [this message]
2020-02-23  9:58 ` Still a pretty bad time on 5.4.6 with fuse_request_end Greg KH
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-03-06  9:31 Bruno Thomsen
2020-03-09 19:03 ` Greg KH
2020-01-05  1:15 Kyle Sanderson
2020-01-05  8:08 ` Greg KH
2020-01-16 11:06 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-02-09  8:09   ` michael+lkml
2020-02-11 10:55     ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-02-12  7:58       ` Michael Stapelberg
2020-02-12  8:34         ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-02-12  9:38           ` Michael Stapelberg
2020-02-12 19:36             ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-02-13  7:23               ` Michael Stapelberg
2020-03-10 18:07               ` Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACsaVZJ7V8hefM+dxY7Rgf8RR7jqcnJgZt+zgT+KM+UQwT7U2g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kyle.leet@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael+lkml@stapelberg.ch \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).