linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@chromium.org>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@google.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] dm-thin: Add REQ_OP_PROVISION support
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 13:03:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG9=OMOMrFcy6UdL8-3wZGwOr1nqLm1bpvL+G1g2dvBhJWU2Kw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZFp7ykxGFUbPG1ON@redhat.com>

On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 9:58 AM Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 06 2023 at  2:29P -0400,
> Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > dm-thinpool uses the provision request to provision
> > blocks for a dm-thin device. dm-thinpool currently does not
> > pass through REQ_OP_PROVISION to underlying devices.
> >
> > For shared blocks, provision requests will break sharing and copy the
> > contents of the entire block. Additionally, if 'skip_block_zeroing'
> > is not set, dm-thin will opt to zero out the entire range as a part
> > of provisioning.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/md/dm-thin.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-thin.c b/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
> > index 2b13c949bd72..3f94f53ac956 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
> > @@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ struct pool {
> >
> >       process_bio_fn process_bio;
> >       process_bio_fn process_discard;
> > +     process_bio_fn process_provision;
> >
> >       process_cell_fn process_cell;
> >       process_cell_fn process_discard_cell;
> > @@ -913,7 +914,8 @@ static void __inc_remap_and_issue_cell(void *context,
> >       struct bio *bio;
> >
> >       while ((bio = bio_list_pop(&cell->bios))) {
> > -             if (op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf) || bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)
> > +             if (op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf) || bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD ||
> > +                 bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_PROVISION)
> >                       bio_list_add(&info->defer_bios, bio);
> >               else {
> >                       inc_all_io_entry(info->tc->pool, bio);
> > @@ -1245,8 +1247,8 @@ static int io_overlaps_block(struct pool *pool, struct bio *bio)
> >
> >  static int io_overwrites_block(struct pool *pool, struct bio *bio)
> >  {
> > -     return (bio_data_dir(bio) == WRITE) &&
> > -             io_overlaps_block(pool, bio);
> > +     return (bio_data_dir(bio) == WRITE) && io_overlaps_block(pool, bio) &&
> > +            bio_op(bio) != REQ_OP_PROVISION;
> >  }
> >
> >  static void save_and_set_endio(struct bio *bio, bio_end_io_t **save,
> > @@ -1953,6 +1955,51 @@ static void provision_block(struct thin_c *tc, struct bio *bio, dm_block_t block
> >       }
> >  }
> >
> > +static void process_provision_bio(struct thin_c *tc, struct bio *bio)
> > +{
> > +     int r;
> > +     struct pool *pool = tc->pool;
> > +     dm_block_t block = get_bio_block(tc, bio);
> > +     struct dm_bio_prison_cell *cell;
> > +     struct dm_cell_key key;
> > +     struct dm_thin_lookup_result lookup_result;
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * If cell is already occupied, then the block is already
> > +      * being provisioned so we have nothing further to do here.
> > +      */
> > +     build_virtual_key(tc->td, block, &key);
> > +     if (bio_detain(pool, &key, bio, &cell))
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     if (tc->requeue_mode) {
> > +             cell_requeue(pool, cell);
> > +             return;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     r = dm_thin_find_block(tc->td, block, 1, &lookup_result);
> > +     switch (r) {
> > +     case 0:
> > +             if (lookup_result.shared) {
> > +                     process_shared_bio(tc, bio, block, &lookup_result, cell);
> > +             } else {
> > +                     bio_endio(bio);
> > +                     cell_defer_no_holder(tc, cell);
> > +             }
> > +             break;
> > +     case -ENODATA:
> > +             provision_block(tc, bio, block, cell);
> > +             break;
> > +
> > +     default:
> > +             DMERR_LIMIT("%s: dm_thin_find_block() failed: error = %d",
> > +                         __func__, r);
> > +             cell_defer_no_holder(tc, cell);
> > +             bio_io_error(bio);
> > +             break;
> > +     }
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void process_cell(struct thin_c *tc, struct dm_bio_prison_cell *cell)
> >  {
> >       int r;
> > @@ -2228,6 +2275,8 @@ static void process_thin_deferred_bios(struct thin_c *tc)
> >
> >               if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)
> >                       pool->process_discard(tc, bio);
> > +             else if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_PROVISION)
> > +                     pool->process_provision(tc, bio);
> >               else
> >                       pool->process_bio(tc, bio);
> >
> > @@ -2579,6 +2628,7 @@ static void set_pool_mode(struct pool *pool, enum pool_mode new_mode)
> >               dm_pool_metadata_read_only(pool->pmd);
> >               pool->process_bio = process_bio_fail;
> >               pool->process_discard = process_bio_fail;
> > +             pool->process_provision = process_bio_fail;
> >               pool->process_cell = process_cell_fail;
> >               pool->process_discard_cell = process_cell_fail;
> >               pool->process_prepared_mapping = process_prepared_mapping_fail;
> > @@ -2592,6 +2642,7 @@ static void set_pool_mode(struct pool *pool, enum pool_mode new_mode)
> >               dm_pool_metadata_read_only(pool->pmd);
> >               pool->process_bio = process_bio_read_only;
> >               pool->process_discard = process_bio_success;
> > +             pool->process_provision = process_bio_fail;
> >               pool->process_cell = process_cell_read_only;
> >               pool->process_discard_cell = process_cell_success;
> >               pool->process_prepared_mapping = process_prepared_mapping_fail;
> > @@ -2612,6 +2663,7 @@ static void set_pool_mode(struct pool *pool, enum pool_mode new_mode)
> >               pool->out_of_data_space = true;
> >               pool->process_bio = process_bio_read_only;
> >               pool->process_discard = process_discard_bio;
> > +             pool->process_provision = process_bio_fail;
> >               pool->process_cell = process_cell_read_only;
> >               pool->process_prepared_mapping = process_prepared_mapping;
> >               set_discard_callbacks(pool);
> > @@ -2628,6 +2680,7 @@ static void set_pool_mode(struct pool *pool, enum pool_mode new_mode)
> >               dm_pool_metadata_read_write(pool->pmd);
> >               pool->process_bio = process_bio;
> >               pool->process_discard = process_discard_bio;
> > +             pool->process_provision = process_provision_bio;
> >               pool->process_cell = process_cell;
> >               pool->process_prepared_mapping = process_prepared_mapping;
> >               set_discard_callbacks(pool);
> > @@ -2749,7 +2802,8 @@ static int thin_bio_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct bio *bio)
> >               return DM_MAPIO_SUBMITTED;
> >       }
> >
> > -     if (op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf) || bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD) {
> > +     if (op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf) || bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD ||
> > +         bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_PROVISION) {
> >               thin_defer_bio_with_throttle(tc, bio);
> >               return DM_MAPIO_SUBMITTED;
> >       }
> > @@ -3396,6 +3450,9 @@ static int pool_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv)
> >       pt->adjusted_pf = pt->requested_pf = pf;
> >       ti->num_flush_bios = 1;
> >       ti->limit_swap_bios = true;
> > +     ti->num_provision_bios = 1;
> > +     ti->provision_supported = true;
> > +     ti->max_provision_granularity = true;
> >
> >       /*
> >        * Only need to enable discards if the pool should pass
> > @@ -4114,6 +4171,8 @@ static void pool_io_hints(struct dm_target *ti, struct queue_limits *limits)
> >        * The pool uses the same discard limits as the underlying data
> >        * device.  DM core has already set this up.
> >        */
> > +
> > +     limits->max_provision_sectors = pool->sectors_per_block;
> >  }
> >
> >  static struct target_type pool_target = {
> > @@ -4288,6 +4347,9 @@ static int thin_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv)
> >               ti->max_discard_granularity = true;
> >       }
> >
> > +     ti->num_provision_bios = 1;
> > +     ti->provision_supported = true;
> > +
>
> We need this in thin_ctr: ti->max_provision_granularity = true;
>
> More needed in the thin target than thin-pool; otherwise provision bio
> issued to thin devices won't be split appropriately.  But I do think
> its fine to set in both thin_ctr and pool_ctr.
>
> Otherwise, looks good.
>
Thanks! I'll add it to the next iteration (in addition to any other
feedback that's added to v6).

Given that this series covers multiple subsystems, would there be a
preferred way of queueing this for merge?

Best
Sarthak

> Thanks,
> Mike

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-11 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20221229071647.437095-1-sarthakkukreti@chromium.org>
2023-04-14  0:02 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Introduce provisioning primitives for thinly provisioned storage Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-14  0:02   ` [PATCH v3 1/3] block: Introduce provisioning primitives Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-17 17:35     ` Brian Foster
2023-04-18 22:13       ` Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-14  0:02   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] dm: Add support for block provisioning Sarthak Kukreti
     [not found]     ` <CAJ0trDbyqoKEDN4kzcdn+vWhx+hk6pTM4ndf-E02f3uT9YZ3Uw@mail.gmail.com>
2023-04-14 18:14       ` Mike Snitzer
2023-04-14 21:58     ` Mike Snitzer
2023-04-18 22:13       ` Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-14  0:02   ` [PATCH v3 3/3] loop: Add support for provision requests Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-18 22:12   ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Introduce provisioning primitives for thinly provisioned storage Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-18 22:12     ` [PATCH v4 1/4] block: Introduce provisioning primitives Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-18 22:43       ` Bart Van Assche
2023-04-20 17:41         ` Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-19 15:36       ` [dm-devel] " Darrick J. Wong
2023-04-19 16:17         ` Mike Snitzer
2023-04-19 17:26           ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-04-19 23:21             ` Dave Chinner
2023-04-20  0:53               ` Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-18 22:12     ` [PATCH v4 2/4] dm: Add block provisioning support Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-18 22:12     ` [PATCH v4 3/4] dm-thin: Add REQ_OP_PROVISION support Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-18 22:12     ` [PATCH v4 4/4] loop: Add support for provision requests Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-20  0:48   ` [PATCH v5 0/5] Introduce block provisioning primitives Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-20  0:48     ` [PATCH v5 1/5] block: Don't invalidate pagecache for invalid falloc modes Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-20  1:22       ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-04-20  1:48         ` Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-20  1:47       ` [PATCH v5-fix " Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-20 16:20         ` Mike Snitzer
2023-04-20 17:28           ` Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-20 18:17             ` Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-20 18:15           ` Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-24 15:54       ` [PATCH v5 " kernel test robot
2023-05-04  8:50       ` kernel test robot
2023-04-20  0:48     ` [PATCH v5 2/5] block: Introduce provisioning primitives Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-20  0:48     ` [PATCH v5 3/5] dm: Add block provisioning support Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-20  0:48     ` [PATCH v5 4/5] dm-thin: Add REQ_OP_PROVISION support Sarthak Kukreti
2023-05-01 19:15       ` Mike Snitzer
2023-05-06  6:32         ` Sarthak Kukreti
2023-04-20  0:48     ` [PATCH v5 5/5] loop: Add support for provision requests Sarthak Kukreti
2023-05-06  6:29     ` [PATCH v6 0/5] Introduce block provisioning primitives Sarthak Kukreti
2023-05-06  6:29       ` [PATCH v6 1/5] block: Don't invalidate pagecache for invalid falloc modes Sarthak Kukreti
2023-05-09 16:51         ` Mike Snitzer
2023-05-12 18:31         ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-06  6:29       ` [PATCH v6 2/5] block: Introduce provisioning primitives Sarthak Kukreti
2023-05-09 16:52         ` Mike Snitzer
2023-05-12 18:37         ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-15 21:55           ` Sarthak Kukreti
2023-05-06  6:29       ` [PATCH v6 3/5] dm: Add block provisioning support Sarthak Kukreti
2023-05-09 16:52         ` Mike Snitzer
2023-05-06  6:29       ` [PATCH v6 4/5] dm-thin: Add REQ_OP_PROVISION support Sarthak Kukreti
2023-05-09 16:58         ` Mike Snitzer
2023-05-11 20:03           ` Sarthak Kukreti [this message]
2023-05-12 14:34             ` Mike Snitzer
2023-05-12 17:32         ` Mike Snitzer
2023-05-15 21:19           ` Sarthak Kukreti
2023-05-06  6:29       ` [PATCH v6 5/5] loop: Add support for provision requests Sarthak Kukreti
2023-05-15 12:40         ` Brian Foster
2023-05-15 21:31           ` Sarthak Kukreti
2023-05-12 18:28       ` [PATCH v6 0/5] Introduce block provisioning primitives Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAG9=OMOMrFcy6UdL8-3wZGwOr1nqLm1bpvL+G1g2dvBhJWU2Kw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=sarthakkukreti@chromium.org \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@google.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).