linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: hubcap@kernel.org
Cc: Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] orangefs: posix open permission checking...
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 11:22:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgbKoRHsbLGDBAA7c6frAtO7GVQt4nxx5kPsixCpTLCDg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191126185018.8283-1-hubcap@kernel.org>

On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:50 AM <hubcap@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Here's another version that is hopefully closer to
> usable...

This looks like it should work.

I don't know what side effects that "new_op->upcall.uid = 0;" will
have on the server side, and it still looks a bit hacky to me, but at
least it doesn't have the obvious problems on the client side.

Arguably, if you trust the client, you might as well just *always* do
that upcall.uid clearing.

And if you don't trust the client, then you'd have to do some NFS-like
root squash anyway, at which point the uid clearing will actually
remove permissions and break this situation again.

So I do think this shows a deeper issue still, but at least it is an
understandable workaround for a non-posix filesystem.

               Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-26 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-26 18:50 [PATCH V3] orangefs: posix open permission checking hubcap
2019-11-26 19:22 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
     [not found]   ` <CAOg9mSQ5hURb-e-hfg-q5_rgCfBC+wh7Z6mLUS_Tdu6iLquDhg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-11-26 22:43     ` Fwd: " Mike Marshall
2019-11-28 15:00 ` Mike Marshall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHk-=wgbKoRHsbLGDBAA7c6frAtO7GVQt4nxx5kPsixCpTLCDg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hubcap@kernel.org \
    --cc=hubcap@omnibond.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).