linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Shuo Chen <shuochen@google.com>,
	linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] epoll: add nsec timeout support with epoll_pwait2
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:50:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a09jUv8YiuZAi5Q-SW4k20Pw0mXdHj9DVznbQ=Kxm2gig@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+FuTSdFTDFwOVyws19CaAP_6+c5gTrvA0ybvDo3LJ-VhPz1eQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 5:21 PM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl
> > index 109e6681b8fa..9a4e8ec207fc 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl
> > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl
> > @@ -447,3 +447,4 @@
> >  440    i386    process_madvise         sys_process_madvise
> >  441    i386    watch_mount             sys_watch_mount
> >  442    i386    memfd_secret            sys_memfd_secret
> > +443    i386    epoll_pwait2            sys_epoll_pwait2                compat_sys_epoll_pwait2
>
> I should have caught this sooner, but this does not work as intended.
>
> x86 will still call epoll_pwait2 with old_timespec32.
>
> One approach is a separate epoll_pwait2_time64 syscall, similar to
> ppoll_time64. But that was added to work around legacy 32-bit ppoll.
> Not needed for a new API.
>
> In libc, ppoll_time64 is declared with type struct __timespec64. That
> type is not defined in Linux uapi. Will need to look at this some
> more.

The libc __timespec64 corresponds to the __kernel_timespec64
structure in uapi. It is defined to only have 'long' nanoseconds
member because that's what c99 and posix require, but the bits
are in the position that matches the lower 32 bits of the 64-bit
tv_nsec in the kernel, and get_timespec64() performs the
necessary conversion to either check or zero the upper bits.

I think all you need in user space is to pass the timeout as a
__timespec64 structure and add a conversion in the exported
library interface.

       Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-18 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-18 14:46 [PATCH v3 0/2] add epoll_pwait2 syscall Willem de Bruijn
2020-11-18 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] epoll: add nsec timeout support with epoll_pwait2 Willem de Bruijn
2020-11-18 15:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-18 15:10     ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-11-18 15:37       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-18 15:59         ` David Laight
2020-11-19 14:19           ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-11-19 14:31             ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-19 15:37               ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-11-19 15:45               ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-19 20:13                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-11-20  8:13                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-20 16:01                     ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-11-20 19:23                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-11-20 22:28                         ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-11-21  9:27                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-12-10 17:33                             ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-12-10 20:34                               ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-12-10 22:59                                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-01-11 20:06                                   ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-11-18 16:21   ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-11-18 16:50     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2020-11-19  3:22       ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-11-18 14:46 ` [PATCH manpages RFC] epoll_wait.2: add epoll_pwait2 Willem de Bruijn
2020-11-18 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] selftests/filesystems: expand epoll with epoll_pwait2 Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAK8P3a09jUv8YiuZAi5Q-SW4k20Pw0mXdHj9DVznbQ=Kxm2gig@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuochen@google.com \
    --cc=soheil.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).