From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk1-f193.google.com ([209.85.222.193]:38172 "EHLO mail-qk1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726720AbeILBO3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 21:14:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180908142837.2819693-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20180908142837.2819693-11-arnd@arndb.de> <20180909043746.GF19965@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 22:13:18 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] compat_ioctl: move tape handling into drivers To: Al Viro Cc: David Miller , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , osst@riede.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Kai.Makisara@kolumbus.fi, Linux Kernel Mailing List , IDE-ML , linux-s390 , osst-users@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-scsi , Linux FS-devel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 5:36 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:38 AM Al Viro wrote: > > > > On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 04:28:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > MTIOCPOS and MTIOCGET are incompatible between 32-bit and 64-bit user > > > space, and traditionally have been translated in fs/compat_ioctl.c. > > > > > > To get rid of that translation handler, move a corresponding > > > implementation into each of the four drivers implementing those commands. > > > > > > The interesting part of that is now in a new linux/mtio.h header that > > > wraps the existing uapi/linux/mtio.h header and provides an abstraction > > > to let drivers handle both cases easily. > > > > Ugh... Frankly, this bool compat passed all way down looks wrong. > > I can live with that; the question is whether block folks will be > > OK with that thing... > > I have tried to come up with an alternative, but couldn't really find anything > that is less ugly. Since nobody else complained, I'll resend this version > along with the other patches. Actually, there was one idea that Deepa mentioned for another subsystem with a similar issue: instead of passing down the fact that we come from a compat syscall through multiple function calls, the lowest ones (put_user_mtpos, put_user_mtget) could call in_compat_syscall(). Would you prefer that? Arnd