linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/12] filesystem-dax: Introduce dax_lock_page()
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 08:20:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4ijwH30mO04eVOHa29HUc++wejuM9NDvRLFJtdcF3tt4g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180612180747.GA28436@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Ross Zwisler
<ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 05:41:46PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>> On Fri 08-06-18 16:51:14, Dan Williams wrote:
>> > In preparation for implementing support for memory poison (media error)
>> > handling via dax mappings, implement a lock_page() equivalent. Poison
>> > error handling requires rmap and needs guarantees that the page->mapping
>> > association is maintained / valid (inode not freed) for the duration of
>> > the lookup.
>> >
>> > In the device-dax case it is sufficient to simply hold a dev_pagemap
>> > reference. In the filesystem-dax case we need to use the entry lock.
>> >
>> > Export the entry lock via dax_lock_page() that uses rcu_read_lock() to
>> > protect against the inode being freed, and revalidates the page->mapping
>> > association under xa_lock().
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>>
>> Some comments below...
>>
>> > diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
>> > index cccf6cad1a7a..b7e71b108fcf 100644
>> > --- a/fs/dax.c
>> > +++ b/fs/dax.c
>> > @@ -361,6 +361,82 @@ static void dax_disassociate_entry(void *entry, struct address_space *mapping,
>> >     }
>> >  }
>> >
>> > +struct page *dax_lock_page(unsigned long pfn)
>> > +{
>>
>> Why do you return struct page here? Any reason behind that? Because struct
>> page exists and can be accessed through pfn_to_page() regardless of result
>> of this function so it looks a bit confusing. Also dax_lock_page() name
>> seems a bit confusing. Maybe dax_lock_pfn_mapping_entry()?
>
> It's also a bit awkward that the functions are asymmetric in their arguments:
> dax_lock_page(pfn) vs dax_unlock_page(struct page)
>
> Looking at dax_lock_page(), we only use 'pfn' to get 'page', so maybe it would
> be cleaner to just always deal with struct page, i.e.:
>
> void dax_lock_page(struct page *page);
> void dax_unlock_page(struct page *page);

No, intent was to have the locking routine return the object that it
validated and then deal with that same object at unlock.
dax_lock_page() can fail to acquire a lock.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-04 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-08 23:50 [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: Teach memory_failure() about ZONE_DEVICE pages Dan Williams
2018-06-08 23:50 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] device-dax: Convert to vmf_insert_mixed and vm_fault_t Dan Williams
2018-06-08 23:50 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] device-dax: Cleanup vm_fault de-reference chains Dan Williams
2018-06-11 17:12   ` Laurent Dufour
2018-06-11 17:14     ` Dan Williams
2018-06-08 23:50 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] device-dax: Enable page_mapping() Dan Williams
2018-06-08 23:50 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] device-dax: Set page->index Dan Williams
2018-06-08 23:50 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] filesystem-dax: " Dan Williams
2018-06-08 23:50 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] mm, madvise_inject_error: Let memory_failure() optionally take a page reference Dan Williams
2018-06-08 23:50 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] x86/mm/pat: Prepare {reserve, free}_memtype() for "decoy" addresses Dan Williams
2018-06-08 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] x86/memory_failure: Introduce {set, clear}_mce_nospec() Dan Williams
2018-06-08 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] mm, memory_failure: Pass page size to kill_proc() Dan Williams
2018-06-08 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] filesystem-dax: Introduce dax_lock_page() Dan Williams
2018-06-11 15:41   ` Jan Kara
2018-06-11 16:48     ` Dan Williams
2018-06-12 18:07     ` Ross Zwisler
2018-07-04 15:20       ` Dan Williams [this message]
2018-07-04 15:17     ` Dan Williams
2018-06-12 18:15   ` Ross Zwisler
2018-07-04 15:11     ` Dan Williams
2018-06-08 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] mm, memory_failure: Teach memory_failure() about dev_pagemap pages Dan Williams
2018-06-11 15:50   ` Jan Kara
2018-06-11 16:45     ` Dan Williams
2018-06-12 20:14   ` Ross Zwisler
2018-06-12 23:38     ` Dan Williams
2018-06-08 23:51 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] libnvdimm, pmem: Restore page attributes when clearing errors Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPcyv4ijwH30mO04eVOHa29HUc++wejuM9NDvRLFJtdcF3tt4g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).