From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Benjamin LaHaise <ben@communityfibre.ca>,
Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>,
Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@google.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+b91eb2ed18f599dd3c31@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "fs/aio: Make io_cancel() generate completions again"
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 12:29:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bce48abd-8e8c-4ee9-b49f-1595e6aa8f8a@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240305-hinunter-atempause-5a3784811337@brauner>
On 3/5/24 00:50, Christian Brauner wrote:
> We've been wrestling aio cancellations for a while now and aimed to
> actually remove it but apparently it's used in the wild. I still very
> much prefer if we could finally nuke this code.
io_cancel() is being used by at least the Android user space code for
cancelling pending USB writes. As far as I know we (Linux kernel
developers) are not allowed to break existing user space code. See also:
*
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/av/+/refs/heads/main/media/mtp/MtpFfsHandle.cpp
*
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/packages/modules/adb/+/refs/heads/main/daemon/usb.cpp
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-05 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-04 18:29 [PATCH] Revert "fs/aio: Make io_cancel() generate completions again" Bart Van Assche
2024-03-04 19:31 ` Eric Biggers
2024-03-05 8:50 ` Christian Brauner
2024-03-05 20:29 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2024-03-05 9:01 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bce48abd-8e8c-4ee9-b49f-1595e6aa8f8a@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=avi@scylladb.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ben@communityfibre.ca \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dhavale@google.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+b91eb2ed18f599dd3c31@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).