linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com,
	io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] io_uring: add IORING_OP_READ{WRITE}V_PI cmd
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:19:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3a98504-947b-1235-c9d6-c9f1ccbaba6f@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200226165309.GA3995@infradead.org>

On 2/27/20 12:53 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 08:58:46AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Yeah, should probably be a RWF_ flag instead, and a 64-bit SQE field
>> for the PI data. The 'last iovec is PI' is kind of icky.
> 
> Abusing an iovec (although I though of the first once when looking
> into it) looks really horrible, but has two huge advantages:
> 
>  - it doesn't require passing another argument all the way down
>    the I/O stack
>  - it works with all the vectored interfaces that take a flag
>    argument, so not just io_uring, but also preadv2/pwritev2 and aio.
>    And while I don't care too much about the last I think preadv2
>    and pwritev2 are valuable to support.
> 

Indeed, actually the 'last iovec is PI' idea was learned from Darrick's original
patch which support PI passthrough via aio.
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org/msg27537.html


  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-27  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-26  8:37 [RFC PATCH 0/4] userspace PI passthrough via io_uring Bob Liu
2020-02-26  8:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] io_uring: add IORING_OP_READ{WRITE}V_PI cmd Bob Liu
2020-02-26 14:24   ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-26 15:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-26 15:58       ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-26 16:03         ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-26 16:53         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-27  9:19           ` Bob Liu [this message]
2020-02-27  9:05     ` Bob Liu
2020-02-26  8:37 ` [PATCH 2/4] bio-integrity: introduce two funcs handle protect information Bob Liu
2020-02-26 16:03   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-27  9:23     ` Bob Liu
2020-02-26  8:37 ` [PATCH 3/4] block_dev: support protect information passthrough Bob Liu
2020-02-26 16:04   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-26  8:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] liburing/test: add testcase for " Bob Liu
2020-02-26 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] userspace PI passthrough via io_uring Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c3a98504-947b-1235-c9d6-c9f1ccbaba6f@oracle.com \
    --to=bob.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).