From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 9/9] proc: Use the generic vfs revoke facility that now exists.
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 05:14:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1ljq75qv9.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1skkf761y.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Sat\, 11 Apr 2009 05\:01\:29 -0700")
Doing this the code becomes much simpler and more robust.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
fs/proc/generic.c | 100 +++++----------
fs/proc/inode.c | 339 +----------------------------------------------
fs/proc/internal.h | 2 +
fs/proc/root.c | 2 +-
include/linux/proc_fs.h | 4 -
5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 411 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/generic.c b/fs/proc/generic.c
index fa678ab..5453114 100644
--- a/fs/proc/generic.c
+++ b/fs/proc/generic.c
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/completion.h>
+#include <linux/file.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include "internal.h"
@@ -37,7 +39,7 @@ static int proc_match(int len, const char *name, struct proc_dir_entry *de)
#define PROC_BLOCK_SIZE (PAGE_SIZE - 1024)
static ssize_t
-__proc_file_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t nbytes,
+proc_file_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t nbytes,
loff_t *ppos)
{
struct inode * inode = file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
@@ -183,27 +185,6 @@ __proc_file_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t nbytes,
}
static ssize_t
-proc_file_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t nbytes,
- loff_t *ppos)
-{
- struct proc_dir_entry *pde = PDE(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
- ssize_t rv = -EIO;
-
- spin_lock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- if (!pde->proc_fops) {
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- return rv;
- }
- pde->pde_users++;
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
-
- rv = __proc_file_read(file, buf, nbytes, ppos);
-
- pde_users_dec(pde);
- return rv;
-}
-
-static ssize_t
proc_file_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
@@ -211,17 +192,8 @@ proc_file_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
ssize_t rv = -EIO;
if (pde->write_proc) {
- spin_lock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- if (!pde->proc_fops) {
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- return rv;
- }
- pde->pde_users++;
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
-
/* FIXME: does this routine need ppos? probably... */
rv = pde->write_proc(file, buffer, count, pde->data);
- pde_users_dec(pde);
}
return rv;
}
@@ -630,10 +602,6 @@ static struct proc_dir_entry *__proc_create(struct proc_dir_entry **parent,
ent->mode = mode;
ent->nlink = nlink;
atomic_set(&ent->count, 1);
- ent->pde_users = 0;
- spin_lock_init(&ent->pde_unload_lock);
- ent->pde_unload_completion = NULL;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ent->pde_openers);
out:
return ent;
}
@@ -777,6 +745,33 @@ void free_proc_entry(struct proc_dir_entry *de)
kfree(de);
}
+static struct inode *get_pde_inode(struct proc_dir_entry *de)
+{
+ struct inode *inode = NULL;
+ struct super_block *sb;
+
+ spin_lock(&sb_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(sb, &proc_fs_type.fs_supers, s_instances) {
+ inode = ilookup(sb, de->low_ino);
+ if (inode && inode->i_fop != &revoked_file_ops)
+ break;
+ iput(inode);
+ inode = NULL;
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
+ return inode;
+}
+
+static void proc_revoke_pde(struct proc_dir_entry *de)
+{
+ struct inode *inode;
+
+ while ((inode = get_pde_inode(de))) {
+ inode_fops_substitute(inode, &revoked_file_ops, &revoked_vm_ops);
+ iput(inode);
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Remove a /proc entry and free it if it's not currently in use.
*/
@@ -804,40 +799,7 @@ void remove_proc_entry(const char *name, struct proc_dir_entry *parent)
if (!de)
return;
- spin_lock(&de->pde_unload_lock);
- /*
- * Stop accepting new callers into module. If you're
- * dynamically allocating ->proc_fops, save a pointer somewhere.
- */
- de->proc_fops = NULL;
- /* Wait until all existing callers into module are done. */
- if (de->pde_users > 0) {
- DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(c);
-
- if (!de->pde_unload_completion)
- de->pde_unload_completion = &c;
-
- spin_unlock(&de->pde_unload_lock);
-
- wait_for_completion(de->pde_unload_completion);
-
- goto continue_removing;
- }
- spin_unlock(&de->pde_unload_lock);
-
-continue_removing:
- spin_lock(&de->pde_unload_lock);
- while (!list_empty(&de->pde_openers)) {
- struct pde_opener *pdeo;
-
- pdeo = list_first_entry(&de->pde_openers, struct pde_opener, lh);
- list_del(&pdeo->lh);
- spin_unlock(&de->pde_unload_lock);
- pdeo->release(pdeo->inode, pdeo->file);
- kfree(pdeo);
- spin_lock(&de->pde_unload_lock);
- }
- spin_unlock(&de->pde_unload_lock);
+ proc_revoke_pde(de);
if (S_ISDIR(de->mode))
parent->nlink--;
diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c
index d78ade3..aa7e629 100644
--- a/fs/proc/inode.c
+++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
@@ -117,330 +117,6 @@ static const struct super_operations proc_sops = {
.statfs = simple_statfs,
};
-static void __pde_users_dec(struct proc_dir_entry *pde)
-{
- pde->pde_users--;
- if (pde->pde_unload_completion && pde->pde_users == 0)
- complete(pde->pde_unload_completion);
-}
-
-void pde_users_dec(struct proc_dir_entry *pde)
-{
- spin_lock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- __pde_users_dec(pde);
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
-}
-
-static loff_t proc_reg_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
-{
- struct proc_dir_entry *pde = PDE(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
- loff_t rv = -EINVAL;
- loff_t (*llseek)(struct file *, loff_t, int);
-
- spin_lock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- /*
- * remove_proc_entry() is going to delete PDE (as part of module
- * cleanup sequence). No new callers into module allowed.
- */
- if (!pde->proc_fops) {
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- return rv;
- }
- /*
- * Bump refcount so that remove_proc_entry will wail for ->llseek to
- * complete.
- */
- pde->pde_users++;
- /*
- * Save function pointer under lock, to protect against ->proc_fops
- * NULL'ifying right after ->pde_unload_lock is dropped.
- */
- llseek = pde->proc_fops->llseek;
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
-
- if (!llseek)
- llseek = default_llseek;
- rv = llseek(file, offset, whence);
-
- pde_users_dec(pde);
- return rv;
-}
-
-static ssize_t proc_reg_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
-{
- struct proc_dir_entry *pde = PDE(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
- ssize_t rv = -EIO;
- ssize_t (*read)(struct file *, char __user *, size_t, loff_t *);
-
- spin_lock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- if (!pde->proc_fops) {
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- return rv;
- }
- pde->pde_users++;
- read = pde->proc_fops->read;
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
-
- if (read)
- rv = read(file, buf, count, ppos);
-
- pde_users_dec(pde);
- return rv;
-}
-
-static ssize_t proc_reg_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
-{
- struct proc_dir_entry *pde = PDE(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
- ssize_t rv = -EIO;
- ssize_t (*write)(struct file *, const char __user *, size_t, loff_t *);
-
- spin_lock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- if (!pde->proc_fops) {
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- return rv;
- }
- pde->pde_users++;
- write = pde->proc_fops->write;
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
-
- if (write)
- rv = write(file, buf, count, ppos);
-
- pde_users_dec(pde);
- return rv;
-}
-
-static unsigned int proc_reg_poll(struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *pts)
-{
- struct proc_dir_entry *pde = PDE(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
- unsigned int rv = DEFAULT_POLLMASK;
- unsigned int (*poll)(struct file *, struct poll_table_struct *);
-
- spin_lock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- if (!pde->proc_fops) {
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- return rv;
- }
- pde->pde_users++;
- poll = pde->proc_fops->poll;
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
-
- if (poll)
- rv = poll(file, pts);
-
- pde_users_dec(pde);
- return rv;
-}
-
-static long proc_reg_unlocked_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
-{
- struct proc_dir_entry *pde = PDE(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
- long rv = -ENOTTY;
- long (*unlocked_ioctl)(struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long);
- int (*ioctl)(struct inode *, struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long);
-
- spin_lock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- if (!pde->proc_fops) {
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- return rv;
- }
- pde->pde_users++;
- unlocked_ioctl = pde->proc_fops->unlocked_ioctl;
- ioctl = pde->proc_fops->ioctl;
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
-
- if (unlocked_ioctl) {
- rv = unlocked_ioctl(file, cmd, arg);
- if (rv == -ENOIOCTLCMD)
- rv = -EINVAL;
- } else if (ioctl) {
- lock_kernel();
- rv = ioctl(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode, file, cmd, arg);
- unlock_kernel();
- }
-
- pde_users_dec(pde);
- return rv;
-}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
-static long proc_reg_compat_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
-{
- struct proc_dir_entry *pde = PDE(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
- long rv = -ENOTTY;
- long (*compat_ioctl)(struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long);
-
- spin_lock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- if (!pde->proc_fops) {
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- return rv;
- }
- pde->pde_users++;
- compat_ioctl = pde->proc_fops->compat_ioctl;
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
-
- if (compat_ioctl)
- rv = compat_ioctl(file, cmd, arg);
-
- pde_users_dec(pde);
- return rv;
-}
-#endif
-
-static int proc_reg_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
-{
- struct proc_dir_entry *pde = PDE(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
- int rv = -EIO;
- int (*mmap)(struct file *, struct vm_area_struct *);
-
- spin_lock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- if (!pde->proc_fops) {
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- return rv;
- }
- pde->pde_users++;
- mmap = pde->proc_fops->mmap;
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
-
- if (mmap)
- rv = mmap(file, vma);
-
- pde_users_dec(pde);
- return rv;
-}
-
-static int proc_reg_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
-{
- struct proc_dir_entry *pde = PDE(inode);
- int rv = 0;
- int (*open)(struct inode *, struct file *);
- int (*release)(struct inode *, struct file *);
- struct pde_opener *pdeo;
-
- /*
- * What for, you ask? Well, we can have open, rmmod, remove_proc_entry
- * sequence. ->release won't be called because ->proc_fops will be
- * cleared. Depending on complexity of ->release, consequences vary.
- *
- * We can't wait for mercy when close will be done for real, it's
- * deadlockable: rmmod foo </proc/foo . So, we're going to do ->release
- * by hand in remove_proc_entry(). For this, save opener's credentials
- * for later.
- */
- pdeo = kmalloc(sizeof(struct pde_opener), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!pdeo)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- spin_lock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- if (!pde->proc_fops) {
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- kfree(pdeo);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- pde->pde_users++;
- open = pde->proc_fops->open;
- release = pde->proc_fops->release;
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
-
- if (open)
- rv = open(inode, file);
-
- spin_lock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- if (rv == 0 && release) {
- /* To know what to release. */
- pdeo->inode = inode;
- pdeo->file = file;
- /* Strictly for "too late" ->release in proc_reg_release(). */
- pdeo->release = release;
- list_add(&pdeo->lh, &pde->pde_openers);
- } else
- kfree(pdeo);
- __pde_users_dec(pde);
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- return rv;
-}
-
-static struct pde_opener *find_pde_opener(struct proc_dir_entry *pde,
- struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
-{
- struct pde_opener *pdeo;
-
- list_for_each_entry(pdeo, &pde->pde_openers, lh) {
- if (pdeo->inode == inode && pdeo->file == file)
- return pdeo;
- }
- return NULL;
-}
-
-static int proc_reg_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
-{
- struct proc_dir_entry *pde = PDE(inode);
- int rv = 0;
- int (*release)(struct inode *, struct file *);
- struct pde_opener *pdeo;
-
- spin_lock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- pdeo = find_pde_opener(pde, inode, file);
- if (!pde->proc_fops) {
- /*
- * Can't simply exit, __fput() will think that everything is OK,
- * and move on to freeing struct file. remove_proc_entry() will
- * find slacker in opener's list and will try to do non-trivial
- * things with struct file. Therefore, remove opener from list.
- *
- * But if opener is removed from list, who will ->release it?
- */
- if (pdeo) {
- list_del(&pdeo->lh);
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- rv = pdeo->release(inode, file);
- kfree(pdeo);
- } else
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
- return rv;
- }
- pde->pde_users++;
- release = pde->proc_fops->release;
- if (pdeo) {
- list_del(&pdeo->lh);
- kfree(pdeo);
- }
- spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
-
- if (release)
- rv = release(inode, file);
-
- pde_users_dec(pde);
- return rv;
-}
-
-static const struct file_operations proc_reg_file_ops = {
- .llseek = proc_reg_llseek,
- .read = proc_reg_read,
- .write = proc_reg_write,
- .poll = proc_reg_poll,
- .unlocked_ioctl = proc_reg_unlocked_ioctl,
-#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
- .compat_ioctl = proc_reg_compat_ioctl,
-#endif
- .mmap = proc_reg_mmap,
- .open = proc_reg_open,
- .release = proc_reg_release,
-};
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
-static const struct file_operations proc_reg_file_ops_no_compat = {
- .llseek = proc_reg_llseek,
- .read = proc_reg_read,
- .write = proc_reg_write,
- .poll = proc_reg_poll,
- .unlocked_ioctl = proc_reg_unlocked_ioctl,
- .mmap = proc_reg_mmap,
- .open = proc_reg_open,
- .release = proc_reg_release,
-};
-#endif
-
struct inode *proc_get_inode(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int ino,
struct proc_dir_entry *de)
{
@@ -465,19 +141,8 @@ struct inode *proc_get_inode(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int ino,
inode->i_nlink = de->nlink;
if (de->proc_iops)
inode->i_op = de->proc_iops;
- if (de->proc_fops) {
- if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
- if (!de->proc_fops->compat_ioctl)
- inode->i_fop =
- &proc_reg_file_ops_no_compat;
- else
-#endif
- inode->i_fop = &proc_reg_file_ops;
- } else {
- inode->i_fop = de->proc_fops;
- }
- }
+ if (de->proc_fops)
+ inode->i_fop = de->proc_fops;
unlock_new_inode(inode);
} else
de_put(de);
diff --git a/fs/proc/internal.h b/fs/proc/internal.h
index f6db961..ea658ac 100644
--- a/fs/proc/internal.h
+++ b/fs/proc/internal.h
@@ -92,3 +92,5 @@ struct pde_opener {
struct list_head lh;
};
void pde_users_dec(struct proc_dir_entry *pde);
+
+extern struct file_system_type proc_fs_type;
diff --git a/fs/proc/root.c b/fs/proc/root.c
index 1e15a2b..ba7a99d 100644
--- a/fs/proc/root.c
+++ b/fs/proc/root.c
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static void proc_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
put_pid_ns(ns);
}
-static struct file_system_type proc_fs_type = {
+struct file_system_type proc_fs_type = {
.name = "proc",
.get_sb = proc_get_sb,
.kill_sb = proc_kill_sb,
diff --git a/include/linux/proc_fs.h b/include/linux/proc_fs.h
index fbfa3d4..2baeb37 100644
--- a/include/linux/proc_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/proc_fs.h
@@ -72,10 +72,6 @@ struct proc_dir_entry {
read_proc_t *read_proc;
write_proc_t *write_proc;
atomic_t count; /* use count */
- int pde_users; /* number of callers into module in progress */
- spinlock_t pde_unload_lock; /* proc_fops checks and pde_users bumps */
- struct completion *pde_unload_completion;
- struct list_head pde_openers; /* who did ->open, but not ->release */
};
struct kcore_list {
--
1.6.1.2.350.g88cc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-11 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-11 12:01 [RFC][PATCH 0/9] File descriptor hot-unplug support Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-11 12:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/9] mm: Introduce remap_file_mappings Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-11 12:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/9] mm: Implement generic support for revoking a mapping Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-11 12:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/9] sysfs: Use remap_file_mappings Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-11 12:07 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/9] vfs: Generalize the file_list Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-11 12:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/9] vfs: Introduce basic infrastructure for revoking a file Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-14 22:12 ` Jonathan Corbet
2009-04-15 2:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-11 12:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/9] vfs: Utilize fops_read_lock where appropriate Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-11 12:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/9] vfs: Optimize fops_read_lock Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-11 12:13 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/9] vfs: Implement generic revoked file operations Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-12 18:56 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-12 20:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-12 20:31 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-12 21:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-12 20:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-12 21:02 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-12 23:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-11 12:14 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2009-04-11 15:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/9] File descriptor hot-unplug support Al Viro
2009-04-11 16:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-11 16:56 ` Al Viro
2009-04-11 23:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-12 20:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-14 3:16 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-14 7:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-14 7:45 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-14 8:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-14 8:49 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-14 15:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-14 19:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:45 ` [PATCH 0/23] File descriptor hot-unplug support v2 Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 01/23] mm: Introduce revoke_file_mappings Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-02 0:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 02/23] vfs: Implement unpoll_file Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-06 8:08 ` Al Viro
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 03/23] vfs: Generalize the file_list Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-02 7:06 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-05 19:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-09 10:38 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-09 18:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-10 6:05 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 04/23] vfs: Introduce infrastructure for revoking a file Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-02 5:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-02 6:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-02 7:08 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-02 7:14 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-02 17:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-02 20:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-03 6:37 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-02 22:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-03 6:38 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-05 9:03 ` Miklos Szeredi
2009-06-05 19:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 05/23] vfs: Teach lseek to use file_hotplug_lock Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 06/23] vfs: Teach read/write to use file_hotplug_read_lock Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 07/23] vfs: Teach sendfile,splice,tee,and vmsplice to use file_hotplug_lock Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-03 23:39 ` Badari Pulavarty
2009-06-05 19:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 08/23] vfs: Teach readdir " Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 09/23] vfs: Teach poll and select " Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 10/23] vfs: Teach do_path_lookup " Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 11/23] mm: Teach mmap " Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 12/23] vfs: Teach fcntl " Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 13/23] vfs: Teach ioctl " Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 14/23] vfs: Teach flock " Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 15/23] vfs: Teach fallocate, and filp_close " Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 16/23] vfs: Teach fstatfs, fstatfs64, ftruncate, fchdir, fchmod, fchown " Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 17/23] proc: Teach /proc/<pid>/fd " Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 18/23] vfs: Teach epoll " Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-02 16:51 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-02 21:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-02 21:52 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-02 22:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-03 14:57 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-03 20:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-04 0:50 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-04 1:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 19/23] eventpoll: Fix comment Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 20/23] vfs: Teach aio to use file_hotplug_lock Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 21/23] vfs: Teach fsync " Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 22/23] vfs: Teach fadvice to file_hotplug_lock Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-01 21:50 ` [PATCH 23/23] vfs: Teach readahead to use the file_hotplug_lock Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-03 23:25 ` Badari Pulavarty
2009-06-06 8:03 ` [PATCH 0/23] File descriptor hot-unplug support v2 Al Viro
2009-06-08 9:41 ` Miklos Szeredi
2009-06-08 10:24 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-06-08 16:29 ` Al Viro
2009-06-08 16:44 ` Miklos Szeredi
2009-06-08 17:50 ` Al Viro
2009-06-08 18:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-08 18:50 ` Al Viro
2009-06-08 19:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-09 6:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-09 10:52 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-09 5:50 ` Miklos Szeredi
2009-06-09 6:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-09 6:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1ljq75qv9.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).