From: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>,
Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/9] gpio: ep93xx: Fix single irqchip with multi gpiochips
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:46:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210127104617.1173-3-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210127104617.1173-1-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
Fixes the following warnings which results in interrupts disabled on
port B/F:
gpio gpiochip1: (B): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver.
gpio gpiochip5: (F): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver.
- added separate irqchip for each interrupt capable gpiochip
- provided unique names for each irqchip
- reworked ep93xx_gpio_port to make it usable before chip_add_data
in ep93xx_init_irq_chips
Fixes: a8173820f441 ("gpio: gpiolib: Allow GPIO IRQs to lazy disable")
Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c
index 0d0435c07a5a..2eea02c906e0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c
@@ -34,9 +34,12 @@
*/
#define EP93XX_GPIO_F_IRQ_BASE 80
+#define EP93XX_GPIO_IRQ_CHIPS_NUM 3
+
struct ep93xx_gpio {
void __iomem *base;
struct gpio_chip gc[8];
+ struct irq_chip ic[EP93XX_GPIO_IRQ_CHIPS_NUM];
};
/*
@@ -55,6 +58,11 @@ static unsigned char gpio_int_type2[3];
static unsigned char gpio_int_debounce[3];
/* Port ordering is: A B F */
+static const char * const irq_chip_names[] = {
+ "gpio-irq-a",
+ "gpio-irq-b",
+ "gpio-irq-f"
+};
static const u8 int_type1_register_offset[3] = { 0x90, 0xac, 0x4c };
static const u8 int_type2_register_offset[3] = { 0x94, 0xb0, 0x50 };
static const u8 eoi_register_offset[3] = { 0x98, 0xb4, 0x54 };
@@ -77,9 +85,8 @@ static void ep93xx_gpio_update_int_params(struct ep93xx_gpio *epg, unsigned port
epg->base + int_en_register_offset[port]);
}
-static int ep93xx_gpio_port(struct gpio_chip *gc)
+static int ep93xx_gpio_port(struct ep93xx_gpio *epg, struct gpio_chip *gc)
{
- struct ep93xx_gpio *epg = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
int port = 0;
while (port < ARRAY_SIZE(epg->gc) && gc != &epg->gc[port])
@@ -101,7 +108,7 @@ static void ep93xx_gpio_int_debounce(struct gpio_chip *gc,
unsigned int offset, bool enable)
{
struct ep93xx_gpio *epg = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
- int port = ep93xx_gpio_port(gc);
+ int port = ep93xx_gpio_port(epg, gc);
int port_mask = BIT(offset);
if (enable)
@@ -163,7 +170,7 @@ static void ep93xx_gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct ep93xx_gpio *epg = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
- int port = ep93xx_gpio_port(gc);
+ int port = ep93xx_gpio_port(epg, gc);
int port_mask = BIT(d->irq & 7);
if (irqd_get_trigger_type(d) == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) {
@@ -178,7 +185,7 @@ static void ep93xx_gpio_irq_mask_ack(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct ep93xx_gpio *epg = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
- int port = ep93xx_gpio_port(gc);
+ int port = ep93xx_gpio_port(epg, gc);
int port_mask = BIT(d->irq & 7);
if (irqd_get_trigger_type(d) == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
@@ -194,7 +201,7 @@ static void ep93xx_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct ep93xx_gpio *epg = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
- int port = ep93xx_gpio_port(gc);
+ int port = ep93xx_gpio_port(epg, gc);
gpio_int_unmasked[port] &= ~BIT(d->irq & 7);
ep93xx_gpio_update_int_params(epg, port);
@@ -204,7 +211,7 @@ static void ep93xx_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct ep93xx_gpio *epg = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
- int port = ep93xx_gpio_port(gc);
+ int port = ep93xx_gpio_port(epg, gc);
gpio_int_unmasked[port] |= BIT(d->irq & 7);
ep93xx_gpio_update_int_params(epg, port);
@@ -219,7 +226,7 @@ static int ep93xx_gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct ep93xx_gpio *epg = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
- int port = ep93xx_gpio_port(gc);
+ int port = ep93xx_gpio_port(epg, gc);
int offset = d->irq & 7;
int port_mask = BIT(offset);
irq_flow_handler_t handler;
@@ -335,6 +342,22 @@ static int ep93xx_gpio_f_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
return EP93XX_GPIO_F_IRQ_BASE + offset;
}
+static void ep93xx_init_irq_chips(struct ep93xx_gpio *epg)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < EP93XX_GPIO_IRQ_CHIPS_NUM; i++) {
+ struct irq_chip *ic = &epg->ic[i];
+
+ ic->name = irq_chip_names[i];
+ ic->irq_ack = ep93xx_gpio_irq_ack;
+ ic->irq_mask_ack = ep93xx_gpio_irq_mask_ack;
+ ic->irq_mask = ep93xx_gpio_irq_mask;
+ ic->irq_unmask = ep93xx_gpio_irq_unmask;
+ ic->irq_set_type = ep93xx_gpio_irq_type;
+ }
+}
+
static int ep93xx_gpio_add_bank(struct gpio_chip *gc,
struct platform_device *pdev,
struct ep93xx_gpio *epg,
@@ -345,6 +368,7 @@ static int ep93xx_gpio_add_bank(struct gpio_chip *gc,
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct gpio_irq_chip *girq;
int err;
+ int port;
err = bgpio_init(gc, dev, 1, data, NULL, NULL, dir, NULL, 0);
if (err)
@@ -356,7 +380,8 @@ static int ep93xx_gpio_add_bank(struct gpio_chip *gc,
girq = &gc->irq;
if (bank->has_irq || bank->has_hierarchical_irq) {
gc->set_config = ep93xx_gpio_set_config;
- girq->chip = &ep93xx_gpio_irq_chip;
+ port = ep93xx_gpio_port(epg, gc);
+ girq->chip = &epg->ic[port];
}
if (bank->has_irq) {
@@ -423,6 +448,8 @@ static int ep93xx_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (IS_ERR(epg->base))
return PTR_ERR(epg->base);
+ ep93xx_init_irq_chips(epg);
+
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ep93xx_gpio_banks); i++) {
struct gpio_chip *gc = &epg->gc[i];
struct ep93xx_gpio_bank *bank = &ep93xx_gpio_banks[i];
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-27 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-28 15:00 [PATCH] gpiolib: warning on gpiochip->to_irq defined Nikita Shubin
2021-01-04 14:15 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-01-18 9:05 ` [PATCH v2] " Nikita Shubin
2021-01-19 10:51 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-01-27 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] gpio: ep93xx: fixes series patch Nikita Shubin
2021-01-27 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] gpio: ep93xx: fix BUG_ON port F usage Nikita Shubin
2021-01-27 10:46 ` Nikita Shubin [this message]
2021-01-27 21:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] gpio: ep93xx: Fix single irqchip with multi gpiochips Alexander Sverdlin
2021-01-28 10:17 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2021-01-27 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] gpio: ep93xx: Fix wrong irq numbers in port F Nikita Shubin
2021-01-27 21:50 ` Linus Walleij
2021-01-28 10:15 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2021-01-27 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] gpio: ep93xx: drop to_irq binding Nikita Shubin
2021-01-27 12:21 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2021-01-27 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] gpio: ep93xx: Fix typo s/hierarchial/hierarchical Nikita Shubin
2021-01-27 13:20 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2021-01-27 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] gpio: ep93xx: refactor ep93xx_gpio_add_bank Nikita Shubin
2021-01-27 13:24 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2021-01-27 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] gpio: ep93xx: separate IRQ's setup Nikita Shubin
2021-01-27 20:48 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2021-01-27 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] gpio: ep93xx: refactor base IRQ number Nikita Shubin
2021-01-27 11:36 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2021-01-27 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] gpio: ep93xx: replace bools with idx for IRQ ports Nikita Shubin
2021-01-27 11:34 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2021-01-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] gpio: ep93xx: fixes series patch Linus Walleij
2021-01-28 10:19 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2021-01-28 11:57 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210127104617.1173-3-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me \
--to=nikita.shubin@maquefel.me \
--cc=alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkshah@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).