linux-hardening.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux trace kernel <linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Add back FORTIFY_SOURCE logic to kernel_stack event structure
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 09:26:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230713092605.2ddb9788@rorschach.local.home> (raw)

From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

For backward compatibility, older tooling expects to see the kernel_stack
event with a "caller" field that is a fixed size array of 8 addresses. The
code now supports more than 8 with an added "size" field that states the
real number of entries. But the "caller" field still just looks like a
fixed size to user space.

Since the tracing macros that create the user space format files also
creates the structures that those files represent, the kernel_stack event
structure had its "caller" field a fixed size of 8, but in reality, when
it is allocated on the ring buffer, it can hold more if the stack trace is
bigger that 8 functions. The copying of these entries was simply done with
a memcpy():

  size = nr_entries * sizeof(unsigned long);
  memcpy(entry->caller, fstack->calls, size);

The FORTIFY_SOURCE logic noticed at runtime that when the nr_entries was
larger than 8, that the memcpy() was writing more than what the structure
stated it can hold and it complained about it. This is because the
FORTIFY_SOURCE code is unaware that the amount allocated is actually
enough to hold the size. It does not expect that a fixed size field will
hold more than the fixed size.

This was originally solved by hiding the caller assignment with some
pointer arithmetic.

  ptr = ring_buffer_data();
  entry = ptr;

  ptr += offsetof(typeof(*entry), caller);
  memcpy(ptr, fstack->calls, size);

But it is considered bad form to hide from kernel hardening. Instead, make
it work nicely with FORTIFY_SOURCE by adding a new __stack_array() macro
that is specific for this one special use case. The macro will take 4
arguments: type, item, len, field (whereas the __array() macro takes just
the first three). This macro will act just like the __array() macro when
creating the code to deal with the format file that is exposed to user
space. But for the kernel, it will turn the caller field into:

  type item[] __counted_by(field);

or for this instance:

  unsigned long caller[] __counted_by(size);

Now the kernel code can expose the assignment of the caller to the
FORTIFY_SOURCE and everyone is happy!

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230712105235.5fc441aa@gandalf.local.home/

Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace.c         | 25 ++++---------------------
 kernel/trace/trace.h         | 10 ++++++++++
 kernel/trace/trace_entries.h |  2 +-
 kernel/trace/trace_export.c  |  9 +++++++++
 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 20122eeccf97..ca8d3aa1058a 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -3118,7 +3118,6 @@ static void __ftrace_trace_stack(struct trace_buffer *buffer,
 	struct ftrace_stack *fstack;
 	struct stack_entry *entry;
 	int stackidx;
-	void *ptr;
 
 	/*
 	 * Add one, for this function and the call to save_stack_trace()
@@ -3156,32 +3155,16 @@ static void __ftrace_trace_stack(struct trace_buffer *buffer,
 		nr_entries = stack_trace_save(fstack->calls, size, skip);
 	}
 
-	size = nr_entries * sizeof(unsigned long);
 	event = __trace_buffer_lock_reserve(buffer, TRACE_STACK,
-				    (sizeof(*entry) - sizeof(entry->caller)) + size,
+				    struct_size(entry, caller, nr_entries),
 				    trace_ctx);
 	if (!event)
 		goto out;
-	ptr = ring_buffer_event_data(event);
-	entry = ptr;
-
-	/*
-	 * For backward compatibility reasons, the entry->caller is an
-	 * array of 8 slots to store the stack. This is also exported
-	 * to user space. The amount allocated on the ring buffer actually
-	 * holds enough for the stack specified by nr_entries. This will
-	 * go into the location of entry->caller. Due to string fortifiers
-	 * checking the size of the destination of memcpy() it triggers
-	 * when it detects that size is greater than 8. To hide this from
-	 * the fortifiers, we use "ptr" and pointer arithmetic to assign caller.
-	 *
-	 * The below is really just:
-	 *   memcpy(&entry->caller, fstack->calls, size);
-	 */
-	ptr += offsetof(typeof(*entry), caller);
-	memcpy(ptr, fstack->calls, size);
+	entry = ring_buffer_event_data(event);
 
 	entry->size = nr_entries;
+	memcpy(&entry->caller, fstack->calls,
+	       flex_array_size(entry, caller, nr_entries));
 
 	if (!call_filter_check_discard(call, entry, buffer, event))
 		__buffer_unlock_commit(buffer, event);
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
index ed7906b13f09..f0bf0467bc0e 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
@@ -77,6 +77,16 @@ enum trace_type {
 #undef __array
 #define __array(type, item, size)	type	item[size];
 
+/*
+ * For backward compatibility, older user space expects to see the
+ * kernel_stack event with a fixed size caller field. But today the fix
+ * size is ignored by the kernel, and the real structure is dynamic.
+ * Expose to user space: "unsigned long caller[8];" but the real structure
+ * will be "unsigned long caller[] __counted_by(size)"
+ */
+#undef __stack_array
+#define __stack_array(type, item, size, field)		type item[] __counted_by(field);
+
 #undef __array_desc
 #define __array_desc(type, container, item, size)
 
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h b/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h
index 340b2fa98218..c47422b20908 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ FTRACE_ENTRY(kernel_stack, stack_entry,
 
 	F_STRUCT(
 		__field(	int,		size	)
-		__array(	unsigned long,	caller,	FTRACE_STACK_ENTRIES	)
+		__stack_array(	unsigned long,	caller,	FTRACE_STACK_ENTRIES, size)
 	),
 
 	F_printk("\t=> %ps\n\t=> %ps\n\t=> %ps\n"
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_export.c b/kernel/trace/trace_export.c
index 58f3946081e2..1698fc22afa0 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_export.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_export.c
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ static int ftrace_event_register(struct trace_event_call *call,
 #undef __array
 #define __array(type, item, size)			type item[size];
 
+#undef __stack_array
+#define __stack_array(type, item, size, field)		__array(type, item, size)
+
 #undef __array_desc
 #define __array_desc(type, container, item, size)	type item[size];
 
@@ -114,6 +117,9 @@ static void __always_unused ____ftrace_check_##name(void)		\
 	is_signed_type(_type), .filter_type = FILTER_OTHER,			\
 	.len = _len },
 
+#undef __stack_array
+#define __stack_array(_type, _item, _len, _field) __array(_type, _item, _len)
+
 #undef __array_desc
 #define __array_desc(_type, _container, _item, _len) __array(_type, _item, _len)
 
@@ -149,6 +155,9 @@ static struct trace_event_fields ftrace_event_fields_##name[] = {	\
 #undef __array
 #define __array(type, item, len)
 
+#undef __stack_array
+#define __stack_array(type, item, len, field)
+
 #undef __array_desc
 #define __array_desc(type, container, item, len)
 
-- 
2.40.1


             reply	other threads:[~2023-07-13 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-13 13:26 Steven Rostedt [this message]
2023-07-13 16:53 ` [PATCH] tracing: Add back FORTIFY_SOURCE logic to kernel_stack event structure Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230713092605.2ddb9788@rorschach.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).