linux-hwmon.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Wang Shenran <shenran268@gmail.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 103/128] hwmon: (acpi_power_meter) Change log level for 'unsafe software power cap'
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 14:53:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190922185418.2158-103-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190922185418.2158-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Wang Shenran <shenran268@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 6e4d91aa071810deac2cd052161aefb376ecf04e ]

At boot time, the acpi_power_meter driver logs the following error level
message: "Ignoring unsafe software power cap". Having read about it from
a few sources, it seems that the error message can be quite misleading.

While the message can imply that Linux is ignoring the fact that the
system is operating in potentially dangerous conditions, the truth is
the driver found an ACPI_PMC object that supports software power
capping. The driver simply decides not to use it, perhaps because it
doesn't support the object.

The best solution is probably changing the log level from error to warning.
All sources I have found, regarding the error, have downplayed its
significance. There is not much of a reason for it to be on error level,
while causing potential confusions or misinterpretations.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shenran <shenran268@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190724080110.6952-1-shenran268@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c b/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
index 34e45b97629ed..2f2fb19669580 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
@@ -694,8 +694,8 @@ static int setup_attrs(struct acpi_power_meter_resource *resource)
 
 	if (resource->caps.flags & POWER_METER_CAN_CAP) {
 		if (!can_cap_in_hardware()) {
-			dev_err(&resource->acpi_dev->dev,
-				"Ignoring unsafe software power cap!\n");
+			dev_warn(&resource->acpi_dev->dev,
+				 "Ignoring unsafe software power cap!\n");
 			goto skip_unsafe_cap;
 		}
 
-- 
2.20.1


           reply	other threads:[~2019-09-22 19:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <20190922185418.2158-1-sashal@kernel.org>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190922185418.2158-103-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=shenran268@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).