linux-hwmon.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, corbet@lwn.net,
	fenghua.yu@intel.com, jdelvare@suse.com, linux@roeck-us.net,
	len.brown@intel.com, rui.zhang@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH V2 4/8] x86/topology: Fix multiple packages shown on a single-package system
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:16:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220816051633.17775-5-rui.zhang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220816051633.17775-1-rui.zhang@intel.com>

CPUID.1F/B does not emumerate Package level explicitly, instead, all the
APIC-ID bits above the enumerated levels are assumed to be package ID
bits.

Current code gets package ID by shifting out all the APIC-ID bits that
Linux supports, rather than shifting out all the APIC-ID bits that
CPUID.1F enumerates. This introduces problems when CPUID.1F enumerates a
level that Linux does not support.

For example, on an AlderLake-N platform, there are 2 Ecore Modules, which
has 4 atom cores in each module, in a single package.
Linux does not support Module level and interprets the Module ID bits as
package ID and erroneously reports a multi module system as a
multi-package system.

Fix this by using APIC-ID bits above all the CPUID.1F enumerated levels as
package ID.

Suggested-and-reviewed-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c | 14 ++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
index 132a2de44d2f..f7592814e5d5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ int detect_extended_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	unsigned int ht_mask_width, core_plus_mask_width, die_plus_mask_width;
 	unsigned int core_select_mask, core_level_siblings;
 	unsigned int die_select_mask, die_level_siblings;
+	unsigned int pkg_mask_width;
 	bool die_level_present = false;
 	int leaf;
 
@@ -111,10 +112,10 @@ int detect_extended_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	core_level_siblings = smp_num_siblings = LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx);
 	core_plus_mask_width = ht_mask_width = BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax);
 	die_level_siblings = LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx);
-	die_plus_mask_width = BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax);
+	pkg_mask_width = die_plus_mask_width = BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax);
 
 	sub_index = 1;
-	do {
+	while (true) {
 		cpuid_count(leaf, sub_index, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
 
 		/*
@@ -132,8 +133,13 @@ int detect_extended_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 			die_plus_mask_width = BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax);
 		}
 
+		if (LEAFB_SUBTYPE(ecx) != INVALID_TYPE)
+			pkg_mask_width = BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax);
+		else
+			break;
+
 		sub_index++;
-	} while (LEAFB_SUBTYPE(ecx) != INVALID_TYPE);
+	}
 
 	core_select_mask = (~(-1 << core_plus_mask_width)) >> ht_mask_width;
 	die_select_mask = (~(-1 << die_plus_mask_width)) >>
@@ -148,7 +154,7 @@ int detect_extended_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	}
 
 	c->phys_proc_id = apic->phys_pkg_id(c->initial_apicid,
-				die_plus_mask_width);
+				pkg_mask_width);
 	/*
 	 * Reinit the apicid, now that we have extended initial_apicid.
 	 */
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-16  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-16  5:16 [PATCH V2 0/8] x86/topology: Improve CPUID.1F handling Zhang Rui
2022-08-16  5:16 ` [PATCH V2 1/8] perf/x86/intel/P4: Fix smp_num_siblings usage Zhang Rui
2022-08-16  8:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-16  9:47     ` Zhang Rui
2022-08-16 10:08       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-16  5:16 ` [PATCH V2 2/8] hwmon/coretemp: Rename indx to index Zhang Rui
2022-08-16  5:16 ` [PATCH V2 3/8] hwmon/coretemp: Handle large core ID value Zhang Rui
2022-08-16 11:16   ` Guenter Roeck
2022-08-16  5:16 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2022-09-21 16:26   ` [PATCH V2 4/8] x86/topology: Fix multiple packages shown on a single-package system Dave Hansen
2022-09-22 13:38     ` Zhang Rui
2022-08-16  5:16 ` [PATCH V2 5/8] x86/topology: Fix duplicated core ID within a package Zhang Rui
2022-08-16  5:16 ` [PATCH V2 6/8] x86/topology: Fix max_siblings calculation Zhang Rui
2022-08-16  5:16 ` [PATCH V2 7/8] Documentation: x86: Update smp_num_siblings/x86_max_cores description Zhang Rui
2022-08-16  5:16 ` [PATCH V2 8/8] Documentation: x86: Remove obsolete x86_max_dies description Zhang Rui
2022-09-20  1:57 ` [PATCH V2 0/8] x86/topology: Improve CPUID.1F handling Zhang Rui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220816051633.17775-5-rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).