From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-path: Received: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com ([209.85.215.194]:33802 "EHLO mail-pg1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726212AbeLKO2N (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:28:13 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/30] hwmon: (da9052-hwmon) Use permission specific SENSOR[_DEVICE]_ATTR variants To: Steve Twiss Cc: Hardware Monitoring , LKML , Jean Delvare , Support Opensource References: <1544479728-30077-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <1544479728-30077-22-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7021C50E52E@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com> From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 06:28:10 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7021C50E52E@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-hwmon-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org On 12/11/18 3:47 AM, Steve Twiss wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > On 10 December 2018 22:09, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> Subject: [PATCH 21/30] hwmon: (da9052-hwmon) Use permission specific >> SENSOR[_DEVICE]_ATTR variants >> >> Use SENSOR[_DEVICE]_ATTR[_2]_{RO,RW,WO} to simplify the source code, >> to improve readbility, and to reduce the chance of inconsistencies. >> >> Also replace any remaining S_ in the driver with octal values. >> >> The conversion was done automatically with coccinelle. The semantic patches >> and the scripts used to generate this commit log are available at >> https://github.com/groeck/coccinelle-patches/hwmon/. >> >> This patch does not introduce functional changes. It was verified by >> compiling the old and new files and comparing text and data sizes. >> >> Cc: Support Opensource >> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck >> --- >> drivers/hwmon/da9052-hwmon.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++------------------------ > > Thanks, > > I am assuming this previous patch [01/10] hwmon: Introduce SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR_{RO,RW,WO} and variants > from this set, https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489915/ and, > + #define SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR_RO(_name, _func, _index) \ > + SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(_name, 0444, _func##_show, NULL, _index) > Yes, of course. Sorry, I should have mentioned it. > Acked-by: Steve Twiss > Thanks! Guenter