From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] i2c: busses: Add support for atomic transfers in Actions Semi Owl driver
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 19:59:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200909165915.GA387239@BV030612LT> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200909151748.GA11397@mani>
Hi Mani,
Thanks for the review!
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:47:48PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hi Cristi,
>
> On 0908, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> > Atomic transfers are required to properly power off a machine through
> > an I2C controlled PMIC, such as the Actions Semi ATC260x series.
> >
> > System shutdown may happen with interrupts being disabled and, as a
> > consequence, the kernel may hang if the driver does not support atomic
> > transfers.
> >
> > This functionality is essentially implemented by polling the FIFO
> > Status register until either Command Execute Completed or NACK Error
> > bits are set.
> >
>
> Thanks for the patch! I just have couple of minor comments and other
> than that it looks good to me.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Dropped unused return codes from owl_i2c_xfer_data(), per Mani's review
> > - Rebased patch on v5.9-rc4
> >
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c
> > index 672f1f239bd6..29605257831f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> > #include <linux/i2c.h>
> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > #include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/of_device.h>
> >
> > @@ -76,6 +77,7 @@
> > #define OWL_I2C_FIFOCTL_TFR BIT(2)
> >
> > /* I2Cc_FIFOSTAT Bit Mask */
> > +#define OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_CECB BIT(0)
> > #define OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_RNB BIT(1)
> > #define OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_RFE BIT(2)
> > #define OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_TFF BIT(5)
> > @@ -83,7 +85,8 @@
> > #define OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_RFD GENMASK(15, 8)
> >
> > /* I2C bus timeout */
> > -#define OWL_I2C_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(4 * 1000)
> > +#define OWL_I2C_TIMEOUT_MS (4 * 1000)
> > +#define OWL_I2C_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(OWL_I2C_TIMEOUT_MS)
> >
> > #define OWL_I2C_MAX_RETRIES 50
> >
> > @@ -161,29 +164,25 @@ static void owl_i2c_set_freq(struct owl_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> > writel(OWL_I2C_DIV_FACTOR(val), i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_CLKDIV);
> > }
> >
> > -static irqreturn_t owl_i2c_interrupt(int irq, void *_dev)
> > +static void owl_i2c_xfer_data(struct owl_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> > {
> > - struct owl_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = _dev;
> > struct i2c_msg *msg = i2c_dev->msg;
> > - unsigned long flags;
> > unsigned int stat, fifostat;
> >
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&i2c_dev->lock, flags);
> > -
> > i2c_dev->err = 0;
> >
> > /* Handle NACK from slave */
> > fifostat = readl(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_FIFOSTAT);
> > if (fifostat & OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_RNB) {
> > i2c_dev->err = -ENXIO;
> > - goto stop;
> > + return;
> > }
> >
> > /* Handle bus error */
> > stat = readl(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_STAT);
> > if (stat & OWL_I2C_STAT_BEB) {
> > i2c_dev->err = -EIO;
> > - goto stop;
> > + return;
> > }
> >
> > /* Handle FIFO read */
> > @@ -196,18 +195,28 @@ static irqreturn_t owl_i2c_interrupt(int irq, void *_dev)
> > } else {
> > /* Handle the remaining bytes which were not sent */
> > while (!(readl(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_FIFOSTAT) &
> > - OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_TFF) && i2c_dev->msg_ptr < msg->len) {
> > + OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_TFF) && i2c_dev->msg_ptr < msg->len) {
>
> Spurious change?
I have just fixed a small indentation issue (removed extra space char
in front of OWL_I2C...). I will revert it if you think it's not the right
context for doing this (located ~10 lines bellow the previous edit).
> > writel(msg->buf[i2c_dev->msg_ptr++],
> > i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_TXDAT);
> > }
> > }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t owl_i2c_interrupt(int irq, void *_dev)
> > +{
> > + struct owl_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = _dev;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&i2c_dev->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + owl_i2c_xfer_data(i2c_dev);
> >
> > -stop:
> > /* Clear pending interrupts */
> > owl_i2c_update_reg(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_STAT,
> > OWL_I2C_STAT_IRQP, true);
> >
> > complete_all(&i2c_dev->msg_complete);
> > +
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c_dev->lock, flags);
> >
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > @@ -235,8 +244,8 @@ static int owl_i2c_check_bus_busy(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int owl_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
> > - int num)
> > +static int owl_i2c_xfer_common(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
> > + int num, bool atomic)
> > {
> > struct owl_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
> > struct i2c_msg *msg;
> > @@ -280,11 +289,12 @@ static int owl_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
> > goto err_exit;
> > }
> >
> > - reinit_completion(&i2c_dev->msg_complete);
> > + if (!atomic)
> > + reinit_completion(&i2c_dev->msg_complete);
> >
> > - /* Enable I2C controller interrupt */
> > + /* Enable/disable I2C controller interrupt */
> > owl_i2c_update_reg(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_CTL,
> > - OWL_I2C_CTL_IRQE, true);
> > + OWL_I2C_CTL_IRQE, !atomic);
> >
> > /*
> > * Select: FIFO enable, Master mode, Stop enable, Data count enable,
> > @@ -352,20 +362,33 @@ static int owl_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
> >
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c_dev->lock, flags);
> >
> > - time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->msg_complete,
> > - adap->timeout);
> > + if (atomic) {
> > + /* Wait for Command Execute Completed or NACK Error bits */
> > + ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_FIFOSTAT,
> > + val, val & (OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_CECB |
> > + OWL_I2C_FIFOSTAT_RNB),
> > + 10, OWL_I2C_TIMEOUT_MS * 1000);
> > + } else {
> > + time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->msg_complete,
> > + adap->timeout);
> > + if (!time_left)
> > + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> > + }
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&i2c_dev->lock, flags);
> > - if (time_left == 0) {
> > +
> > + if (ret) {
> > dev_err(&adap->dev, "Transaction timed out\n");
> > /* Send stop condition and release the bus */
> > owl_i2c_update_reg(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_CTL,
> > OWL_I2C_CTL_GBCC_STOP | OWL_I2C_CTL_RB,
> > true);
> > - ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> > goto err_exit;
> > }
> >
> > + if (atomic)
> > + owl_i2c_xfer_data(i2c_dev);
>
> You are not clearing the pending interrupts here.
I assumed this is not needed for atomic contexts since the controller
interrupt is disabled (please see the comment above: Enable/disable I2C
controller interrupt).
Otherwise I will simply move the clear pending interrupts code from
owl_i2c_interrupt() to owl_i2c_xfer_data().
> Thanks,
> Mani
>
> > +
> > ret = i2c_dev->err < 0 ? i2c_dev->err : num;
> >
> > err_exit:
> > @@ -379,9 +402,22 @@ static int owl_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static int owl_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
> > + int num)
> > +{
> > + return owl_i2c_xfer_common(adap, msgs, num, false);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int owl_i2c_xfer_atomic(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> > + struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
> > +{
> > + return owl_i2c_xfer_common(adap, msgs, num, true);
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct i2c_algorithm owl_i2c_algorithm = {
> > - .master_xfer = owl_i2c_master_xfer,
> > - .functionality = owl_i2c_func,
> > + .master_xfer = owl_i2c_xfer,
> > + .master_xfer_atomic = owl_i2c_xfer_atomic,
> > + .functionality = owl_i2c_func,
> > };
> >
> > static const struct i2c_adapter_quirks owl_i2c_quirks = {
> > --
> > 2.28.0
> >
Kind regards,
Cristi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-09 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-08 10:52 [PATCH v2 1/1] i2c: busses: Add support for atomic transfers in Actions Semi Owl driver Cristian Ciocaltea
2020-09-09 15:17 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-09-09 16:59 ` Cristian Ciocaltea [this message]
2020-09-10 3:02 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-09-10 14:12 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2020-09-29 19:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-09-29 21:00 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2020-10-08 22:17 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200909165915.GA387239@BV030612LT \
--to=cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=linux-actions@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).