From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Mani, Rajmohan" <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@intel.com>,
Chiranjeevi Rapolu <chiranjeevi.rapolu@intel.com>,
Hyungwoo Yang <hyungwoo.yang@intel.com>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] Support running driver's probe for a device powered off
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 23:49:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200928204905.GD26842@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAFQd5CP7bg+UQEp5uzuQY5a_xHLAB4ct81pkO0naAou=-QyKw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Tomasz,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 06:49:22PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 4:18 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 9:44 PM Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 9:39 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I think we might be overly complicating things. IMHO the series as is
> > > > > with the "i2c_" prefix removed from the flags introduced would be
> > > > > reusable as is for any other subsystem that needs it. Of course, for
> > > > > now, the handling of the flag would remain implemented only in the I2C
> > > > > subsystem.
> > > >
> > > > Just to be clear: you are suggesting to remove "i2c" from the DSD
> > > > binding "i2c-allow-low-power-probe". And you are not talking about
> > > > moving I2C_DRV_FL_ALLOW_LOW_POWER_PROBE to struct device_driver? I
> > > > recall the latter has been NACKed by gkh so far.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'd also drop "I2C_" from "I2C_DRV_FL_ALLOW_LOW_POWER_PROBE", but all
> > > the implementation would remain where it is in the code. IOW, I'm just
> > > suggesting a naming change to avoid proliferating duplicate flags of
> > > the same meaning across subsystems.
> >
> > But that would indicate that the property was recognized by other
> > subsystems which wouldn't be the case, so it would be confusing.
> >
> > That's why it cannot be documented as a general property ATM too.
>
> I guess that's true. Well, this is kAPI in the end, so if we have more
> subsystems, it could be always renamed. So feel free to ignore my
> previous comment.
I wouldn't expect this flag to be needed outside I²C since the other
potential use case (I3C) appears to be entirely free of power management,
so it's up to the drivers on ACPI, too.
The property itself, though, might be.
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-28 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-03 8:15 [PATCH v8 0/6] Support running driver's probe for a device powered off Sakari Ailus
2020-09-03 8:15 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] i2c: Allow an ACPI driver to manage the device's power state during probe Sakari Ailus
2020-09-03 8:15 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] Documentation: ACPI: Document i2c-allow-low-power-probe _DSD property Sakari Ailus
2020-09-03 8:15 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] ACPI: Add a convenience function to tell a device is in low power state Sakari Ailus
[not found] ` <0c2d4728-6e32-ef93-8961-381fe36cfdaa@linux.intel.com>
2020-09-11 13:01 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-09-03 8:15 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] ov5670: Support probe whilst the device is in a " Sakari Ailus
2020-09-03 8:15 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] media: i2c: imx319: Support probe while the device is off Sakari Ailus
2020-09-03 8:15 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] at24: Support probing while off Sakari Ailus
2020-09-09 9:35 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-09-09 11:11 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-09-09 11:56 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-09-09 12:16 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-09-11 12:11 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-10-06 11:20 ` Tomasz Figa
2020-10-06 11:23 ` Tomasz Figa
2020-09-11 12:49 ` [PATCH v8 0/6] Support running driver's probe for a device powered off Luca Ceresoli
2020-09-11 13:01 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-09-14 7:58 ` Luca Ceresoli
[not found] ` <20200914094727.GM26842@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
2020-09-14 16:49 ` Luca Ceresoli
2020-09-23 11:08 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-09-23 15:37 ` Luca Ceresoli
2020-09-26 12:38 ` Tomasz Figa
2020-09-27 19:39 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-09-27 19:44 ` Tomasz Figa
2020-09-28 14:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-09-28 16:49 ` Tomasz Figa
2020-09-28 20:49 ` Sakari Ailus [this message]
2020-09-26 12:46 ` Tomasz Figa
2021-01-28 23:27 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] ACPI: scan: Obtain device's desired enumeration power state Sakari Ailus
[not found] ` <CAJZ5v0hdG1W0D5E6GbrTDiAjMyC0mSgb3Z2WEBy3hhb4iJhDNw@mail.gmail.com>
2021-01-29 16:45 ` Sakari Ailus
2021-01-29 16:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-01-29 21:22 ` Sakari Ailus
2021-02-01 11:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-01-28 23:27 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] i2c: Allow an ACPI driver to manage the device's power state during probe Sakari Ailus
2021-01-28 23:27 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] Documentation: ACPI: Document _PRE object usage for enum power state Sakari Ailus
2021-01-28 23:27 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] ACPI: Add a convenience function to tell a device is in low " Sakari Ailus
2021-01-28 23:27 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] ov5670: Support probe whilst the device is in a " Sakari Ailus
2021-01-28 23:27 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] media: i2c: imx319: Support probe while the device is off Sakari Ailus
2021-01-29 2:58 ` Bingbu Cao
2021-01-28 23:27 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] at24: Support probing while off Sakari Ailus
[not found] ` <CAMpxmJVTPgvxOVdTkmt4VjUnGabNBKauKF_DKtnnkV6O0QYTWA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20210129121955.GH32460@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
2021-02-01 8:57 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200928204905.GD26842@paasikivi.fi.intel.com \
--to=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=bingbu.cao@intel.com \
--cc=chiranjeevi.rapolu@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hyungwoo.yang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca@lucaceresoli.net \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rajmohan.mani@intel.com \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).