Re: [PATCH] i2c: drivers: Avoid unnecessary check inefm32_i2c_probe()

[Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>]

Hi Uwe:

On 2020/4/15 22:31, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Same things apply as in the previous patch. (space after punctuation,
> Sob of sender should be last)
I will notice this problem next time, thanks.
>> ---
>>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-efm32.c | 3 ---
>>   1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-efm32.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-efm32.c
>> index 4de31fae7..4786ef6b2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-efm32.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-efm32.c
>> @@ -312,9 +312,6 @@ static int efm32_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	int ret;
>>   	u32 clkdiv;
>>   
>> -	if (!np)
>> -		return -EINVAL;
>> -
> I don't care much about this change. While the statement that this
> driver is only instantiated on dt platforms is probably right,
> explicitly checking for it might still prevent surprises later, serves
> as explicit statement for the driver reader that non-dt isn't supposed
> to work and given that the check is cheap I tend slightly to just keep
> it.
>
In this driver, the function efm32_i2c_probe() can be triggered only if 
the platform_device and platform_driver matches,  and the matching 
condition is DTS. It's my opinion.

Tnanks,

Tang Bin