From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@broadcom.com>,
Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@broadcom.com>,
Suganath Prabu Subramani <suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] libata: cleanup NCQ priority handling
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 11:09:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f975ceba-d703-25aa-2d4c-65f60a5bafa0@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210806074252.398482-6-damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
On 8/6/21 9:42 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> The ata device flag ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO indicates if a device supports
> the NCQ Priority feature while the ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO_ENABLE device
> flag indicates if the feature is enabled. Enabling NCQ priority use is
> controlled by the user through the device sysfs attribute
> ncq_prio_enable. As a result, the ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO flag should not be
> cleared when ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO_ENABLE is not set as the device still
> supports the feature even after the user disables it. This leads to the
> following cleanups:
> - In ata_build_rw_tf(), set a command high priority bit based on the
> ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO_ENABLE flag, not on the ATA_DFLAG_NCQ flag. That
> is, set a command high priority only if the user enabled NCQ priority
> use.
> - In ata_dev_config_ncq_prio(), ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO should not be cleared
> if ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO_ENABLE is not set. If the device does not
> support NCQ priority, both ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO and
> ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO_ENABLE must be cleared.
>
> With the above ata_dev_config_ncq_prio() change, ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO flag
> is set on device scan and revalidation. There is no need to trigger a
> device revalidation in ata_ncq_prio_enable_store() when the user enables
> the use of NCQ priority. Remove the revalidation code from that funciton
> to simplify it. Also change the return value from -EIO to -EINVAL when a
> user tries to enable NCQ priority for a device that does not support
> this feature. While at it, also simplify ata_ncq_prio_enable_show().
>
> Overall, there is no functional change introduced by this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
> ---
> drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------
> drivers/ata/libata-sata.c | 37 ++++++++++++-------------------------
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: Felix Imendörffer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-06 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-06 7:42 [PATCH v2 0/9] libata cleanups and improvements Damien Le Moal
2021-08-06 7:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] libata: fix ata_host_alloc_pinfo() Damien Le Moal
2021-08-06 8:49 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-08-06 14:25 ` James Bottomley
2021-08-06 14:31 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-06 7:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] libata: fix ata_host_start() Damien Le Moal
2021-08-06 8:50 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-08-06 14:31 ` James Bottomley
2021-08-06 14:33 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-07 3:32 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-06 7:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] libata: cleanup device sleep capability detection Damien Le Moal
2021-08-06 8:50 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-08-06 7:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] libata: cleanup ata_dev_configure() Damien Le Moal
2021-08-06 9:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-08-06 9:12 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-06 9:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-08-06 9:32 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-06 7:42 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] libata: cleanup NCQ priority handling Damien Le Moal
2021-08-06 9:09 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2021-08-06 7:42 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] libata: fix ata_read_log_page() warning Damien Le Moal
2021-08-06 9:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-08-06 7:42 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] libata: print feature list on device scan Damien Le Moal
2021-08-06 9:11 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-08-06 7:42 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] libahci: Introduce ncq_prio_supported sysfs sttribute Damien Le Moal
2021-08-06 7:42 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] scsi: mpt3sas: Introduce sas_ncq_prio_supported " Damien Le Moal
2021-08-06 9:12 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-08-06 9:16 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f975ceba-d703-25aa-2d4c-65f60a5bafa0@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sathya.prakash@broadcom.com \
--cc=sreekanth.reddy@broadcom.com \
--cc=suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).