From: Stefan Monnier <monnier-CRDzTM1onBSWkKpYnGOUKg@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
Cc: linux-ide-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
u-boot-0aAXYlwwYIKGBzrmiIFOJg@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drivers: ata: ahci_sunxi: Increased SATA/AHCI DMA TX/RX FIFOs
Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 09:37:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwvk1ex6rvb.fsf-monnier+gmane.comp.hardware.netbook.arm.sunxi@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20190510192550.17458-1-um@mutluit.com
> Increasing the SATA/AHCI DMA TX/RX FIFOs (P0DMACR.TXTS and .RXTS) from
> default 0x0 each to 0x3 each gives a write performance boost of 120MB/s
> from lame 36MB/s to 45MB/s previously. Read performance is about 200MB/s
> [tested on SSD using dd bs=4K count=512K].
Such a simple patch to fix such a long-standing performance problem that
everyone [ well, apparently not quite everyone ] assumed was a hardware
limitation...
And yet, April 1st is long gone.
Is it really for real?
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-11 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-10 19:25 [RFC PATCH] drivers: ata: ahci_sunxi: Increased SATA/AHCI DMA TX/RX FIFOs Uenal Mutlu
2019-05-11 13:37 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
[not found] ` <jwvk1ex6rvb.fsf-monnier+gmane.comp.hardware.netbook.arm.sunxi-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org>
2019-05-11 18:12 ` U.Mutlu
[not found] ` <20190510192550.17458-1-um-lNbj7F0cCK5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2019-05-12 12:12 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-05-12 16:08 ` U.Mutlu
[not found] ` <5CD844F3.5080103-lNbj7F0cCK5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2019-05-12 17:40 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwvk1ex6rvb.fsf-monnier+gmane.comp.hardware.netbook.arm.sunxi@gnu.org \
--to=monnier-crdztm1onbswkkpyngoukg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-ide-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=u-boot-0aAXYlwwYIKGBzrmiIFOJg@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).